Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2022-05-11 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Date

Attendees 


Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Jakub Skoczen is next in line, followed by Raman Auramau (Philip Robinson was skipped but will be scribe next week)

5 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll


5-10 minTCR Board Review

All


10-15 min

Technical Council Sub Groups Updates

All



10 minLocalization RFC

RFC process adjustments here:  RFC Process

  • Update on progress
1-2 minElectionsAll

From Mike Gorrell :

Simeon Warner and Harry Kaplanian are running this year’s elections for all councils. Please let them know if anyone from PC or TC wants to help out. Also, they ask that you let them know whether you want to change description/qualifications from last year as well as confirm how many seats will be open (should be 5 for each council but not sure whether anyone has/is stepping down).Reminder that 6 seats on the TC/PC were supposed to be 2 year terms, and 5 seats were supposed to be 1 year terms - those 5 seats are the ones open for election this year. The announcement/request for candidates should go out May 9th. Our timetable is:

  1. Call for Nominees May 9, 2022
  2. Nominees due/finalized May 20, 2022
  3. Voting opens May 30, 2022
  4. Voting ends June 17, 2022
  5. Results announce June 20, 2022
  6. New Councils formed/start July 1, 2022

Please let me know if you have any questions. Thanks!

Today:

5-10 minCommunity UpdateAll

Tentative date:  May 27

TC needs to start preparing their update:  Accomplishments in Q1 2022, Goals/plan for Q2 2022

Craig McNally will present at next community update


Today:

  • Any ideas for topics?
5-10 minUpdates from PC and CC?

PC: 

CC: 

5-10 minADRs
  • Leaning towards ADR, will need two distinct tasks
    • someone to lay out process, propose a place to live, design templates.
    • a pilot for the process, Kafka is probably a good candidate
  • Any volunteers to write this up?  
    • Radhakrishnan Gopalakrishnan and Marc Johnson 
    • Proposal (Marc Johnson) : keep it out of the technical decision process. The RFCs are to facilitate the act of making a decisions, ADRs are for recording the decisions; ADR may or may not require the RFC process, but if an RFC is needed they should be linked.

Today:Architecture Decision Log

Action Items

  • No labels