The goal here is to introduce this and get eyes on it. Provide feedback directly in doc, or discuss and provide consolidated feedback from the entire TC?
Tod Olson: discussing and coming to a common understanding would be a good idea here.
Craig McNally: let's all look at this, plan a short discussion next week to organize feedback to the CC.
Hi, all. I was asked on behalf of the FOLIO DevOps team to raise awareness that a recent PR on mod-inventory adds the requirement for a couple of interfaces from mod-source-record-manager and mod-data-import-converter-storage. This effectively means that the entire source record storage and management complex of modules is now required in order to use the Inventory app. We thought that the intent was to allow for FOLIO implementation without the source record storage subsystem.This re-ordering of dependencies causes some of our CI builds to fail (see FOLIO-3297). Fixing this is not really a problem (and we will do it today), but we wanted to double-check that this change is OK. Thanks!
20 min
Technical Decision Making Process
All
This is a carry-over from several weeks ago. It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of:
The tech leads group not being a decision making body
Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic
Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:
Revisit voting rules... simple vs super majority, voting via slack, abstentions, quorum, etc.
NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.
Ongoing work on Acceptance Criteria and Processes (submission, evaluation, etc.)
Has the Acceptance Criteria v1.0 been published somewhere yet? What about references/links in other places.
Agree on short and long term goals
Define processes for submission, evaluation, review, feedback, acceptance
Improve the AC with more verifiable criteria, links to supporting documentation, etc.
Time permitting
Extended Apps / App Store
All
The idea of having a bare-bones/minimal platform defined, which could run on it's own and optionally augmented by installing apps has recently been come up frequently. The notion of having a FOLIO app store has been around since the start of the project, but nothing has ever come of it. The TC may want consider finding a champion and forming a subgroup to define a proposal for how we get there.
Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the link above. Feedback is appreciated
There's a link to PTF analysis from the mentioned doc
Debate regarding cache/caching as a term..
Ian Walls "we could revisit the concept of a Shared Storage module that can allow for data from all these different modules to be retrieved live instead of maintained in duplicate"
Agreed to add a placeholder for the next meeting to continue the discussion.