Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2021-09-29 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Jeremy Huff is next in the list, followed by Marc Johnson

5 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll

10 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from last week... 

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

The goal here is to introduce this and get eyes on it.  Provide feedback directly in doc, or discuss and provide consolidated feedback from the entire TC?

  • Tod Olson: discussing and coming to a common understanding would be a good idea here. 
  • Craig McNally: let's all look at this, plan a short discussion next week to organize feedback to the CC.
20 min

Technical Decision Making Process

All

This is a carry-over from several weeks ago.  It was a tangent of the min.io/S3 conversation that started to delve into topics of:

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Related - in the wake of last week's slack vote:

  • Revisit voting rules... simple vs super majority, voting via slack, abstentions, quorum, etc.

NOTE: We need to frame this conversation and agree upon what we're trying to accomplish and how much time we want to dedicate to it before diving in.

10 minExternal Code Submissions

Ian Walls/All

  • Ongoing work on Acceptance Criteria and Processes (submission, evaluation, etc.)
    • Has the Acceptance Criteria v1.0 been published somewhere yet?  What about references/links in other places.
    • Agree on short and long term goals 
      • Define processes for submission, evaluation, review, feedback, acceptance
      • Improve the AC with more verifiable criteria, links to supporting documentation, etc.


10 minExtended Apps / App StoreAllThe idea of having a bare-bones/minimal platform defined, which could run on it's own and optionally augmented by installing apps has recently been come up frequently.  The notion of having a FOLIO app store has been around since the start of the project, but nothing has ever come of it.  The TC should consider finding a champion and forming a subgroup to define a proposal for how we get there.  Should we agree to do this, it's important that we clearly define the subgroup's goals, objectives, deliverables, and deadlines.   
Time permittingCheck-out Performance 

Marc Johnson

Proposal:  Check Out Performance

Marc Johnson was asked to make a proposal for checking out performance; draft document is available by the link above. Feedback is appreciated

There's a link to PTF analysis from the mentioned doc

Debate regarding cache/caching as a term..

Ian Walls "we could revisit the concept of a Shared Storage module that can allow for data from all these different modules to be retrieved live instead of maintained in duplicate"

Agreed to add a placeholder for the next meeting to continue the discussion.

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

Action items

  •  
  • No labels