Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata
Date
17-Mar-2021
Attendees
Discussion items
Time | Item | Who | Notes |
|---|
| Redundancy of FOLIO's Jira | | Per this issue:
FOLIO-3074
-
Getting issue details...
STATUS
Question: should the FOLIO project use a multi-zone database instance for FOLIO's Jira? The Tech Council should make a recommendation. --- TC affirmed the decision to use a multi-AZ RDS for Jira. Reasoning behind this was added to the FOLIO-3074 issue. |
| New Modules, new teams and impacting our reference environments' CD pipeline | TC | Review last week's discussion: 2021-03-10 Meeting Minutes
Bottom line: We need to define the problem more clearly before we can make progress.
Bottom-line discussion on 3/17/2021: - Can these teams' code be checked in and included in ref envs?
- We need a formal process
- need to formalize expectations for new teams
- both WRT code quality/DoD, and also WRT CI/CD pipeline
- add early integration points!
- Note - we’re not made of money, can’t really support everything in CI, even if micorservices supports everything
- Once we have a documented/formal process, as a community we need to be more careful, more forceful about the process and deadlines
- for current issues, handle this a la release triage process?
- Will always (and should) be a health tension among po, tech lead, scrum master, qa
- Need a way to est source of truth for module ownership then generate the responsibility matrix based on that
|