2023-10-19 Metadata Management Meeting notes

Craig McNally 

VBar 

Craig and Vince will attend the meeting to discuss and answer any questions that may arise.

All: Please watch the recording in advance:

• Link to the recording: https://prod-zoom-recordings-openlibraryfoundation-org.s3.amazonaws.com/276819cf-e9a6-4071-b72f-3bfb01131bbc%2Fshared_screen_with_speaker_view(CC).mp4
• Link to the chat: https://prod-zoom-recordings-openlibraryfoundation-org.s3.amazonaws.com/276819cf-e9a6-4071-b72f-3bfb01131bbc%2Fchat_file.txt
• Link to the PC meeting minutes: 2023-09-14 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes

Related WolfCon23 slidedecks

• Applications And The Management Thereof
• Folio Platforms
• 2023 WOLFcon Architectural Blueprint

My unsorted questions (Felix):

1. Applications:
   1. Slide 9: Are there any disadvantages when several BE modules use the same storage? Would there be an advantage, e.g. better performance for read/write accesses?
   2. Slide 10: Merge mod-inventory and mod-inventory-storage into one module? What are the advantages and disadvantages of this?
   3. Slide 11: Independent application development lifecycles. How exactly is this supposed to work? As I understand it, the flower release is also intended to check the interaction between what Vince calls applications. Not only the interaction of BE/FE modules inside one application.
2. Platform:
   1. Slide 16: I understand Core+Functional to be like the iOS operating system and the Extended part are like applications I can install from the App Store. Would that be a reasonable analogy?
   2. Slide 18: Example ERM: The local KB is part of the Agreements modules, but is not used by the US libraries. How should something like this be handled? You can't simply separate the pieces (AFAIK).
   3. Can one switch from one platform to another, e.g. ERM platform first, then ERM+acquisition platform? Or would one start with ERM platform, stay on it and install the acquisition apps afterwards (as extended)?
   4. Who decides which application belongs in Functional or Extended when it is in dispute?

Questions by Former user (Deleted) 

Who will decide in general (not only when in dispute) which Apps are "common sense" and must be included in "Functional"? What will be the criteria for this decision?
Who will take the resposibility for the "Extended" Apps and that they are capable of running throughout all platforms and all releases and that they are interacting with other apps properly?

PC update

Charlotte Whitt 

2023-10-19 Product Council Agenda and Meeting Notes

Announcements:

New procedure for SIG reporting - SIG Reports 2023-10-19

CC (The Community Council) will reduce it's number of members. 

Now: The council will have 15 members but can operate with a minimum of 9. The council will seek to have a diverse membership.
Proposed replacement: The community council will have 13 members but can operate with a minimum of 7. The council will seek to have a diverse membership.

Current state of FOLIO Quality Assurance testing - presenter: Yogesh Kumar, and Oleksii Petrenko. Link to slidedeck here (when available)

Testing methodology: In Sprint Testing by development teams and Release testing (Bugfest - 3000+ testrail cases)

Example on a UAT survey (Poppy, 2023)

Definitions of Smoke test, Critical path, and Extended 

Release planning:

Release roadmap/time line - e.g. Poppy.

Follow up on Re-architecting Impact on the Product Council report: Link to the report here. And then this topic is the main topic here at today's MM-SIG meeting.

The PC recognise that the current flower releases are problematic, and the PC are endorsing that the community is going ahead discussing how to implement new definiton of applications and platforms, but a further discussion in the tri-council group is necessary, and the PC will suggest check ins around mile stones, to make sure that that stakeholders are being involved, and that re-definition of applications and platforms are not causing new problems.