Thomas Trutt, member of the Prioritization Process Working Group, presented on the new proposed prioritization model → Presentation | Flow Chart:
Community ranking + PO ranking + SIG ranking, each rankings in one of the groups would be added, so that we end up with:
Institutional ranking: One of R1-R4
PO ranking: Will continue to do the PO ranking using a number value, e.g. 150 - 0. Charlotte explained that above 100 is highly ranked feature (when it comes to Inventory. The POs do use these number ranks a little differently.
SIG ranking: One of R1-R4
Qs:
Does each individual get a vote, or each institution? → still in discussion
What about consortia? → Jacquie Samples could you please add your answer here?
what is the definition of "new request” what does that cover? → Gap in the list of features identified – covers new features and updates to existing features, e.g. change to existing functionality
The focus is on epic and feature level
Felix suggest to circle back to this proposal in a couple of weeks
MM SIG liaison to PC. Call for a volunteer.
MM SIG membership. SIG charge document:
Talk about minimal criteria for MM SIG membership. Confluence Wiki account, regular meeting attendance