Date
Attendees
please put an 'x' next to your name in the list below the "Discussion items" if you are attending. Thanks!
Goals
Discussion items
Item | Who | Notes |
---|---|---|
Product Council Update | Former user (Deleted) | Dracine, while not able to attend, emailed Laura that there are no new updates from the Product Council. |
Viewing working version of FOLIO - discussion | Main page of the FOLIO page, there is a link to folio-snapshot-stable https://wiki.folio.org/. This is updated nightly. At the end of September, a fairly stable release will be available here. Laura will let Dracine know that there is a desire for heads of SIGs to meet and react to live versions of FOLIO. | |
Subgroup updates | Batch Loader - The developers have an architecture designed that will be review. Latest discussions surround the log, and what information is desired for the log. The screens need to be finalized in 2-3 weeks. The stories need to go to developers by mid-October at the latest ERM - They began discussing requirements for licenses. Container Records Working Groups - Met with Filip to discuss how to implement a container record as an object similar to an instance record. They also discussed how to integrate with other apps. MARCCat - A sub-sub group has met with Filip to develop starting sketches. This was brought to the MARCCat subgroup today, with positive reactions. | |
Update on UX work for analytics and bound with records | FOLIO snapshot stable will show these developments tomorrow. In relation to the screenshot above, Charlotte asked if the relationships should be explicitly labeled. Example of a labeled screen: The question as to whether or not this could be optional to display was asked. Jacquie could see how this would be very useful to some staff members, but possibly too much information for others. Natascha noted the redundant information in the screen above. Natasha mentioned that the group has to still discuss the issue of how analytics and bound withs will be displayed at the item level. | |
Update on mapping resource types, format, nature of content with Codex terms | "Resource" and "Format type" in Inventory did not correlate with EBSCO's KB terminology. Felix introduced a list used by the German libraries of format type terminology and their applications: Felix Hemme has translated the core terms of rda 7.2.1.3 D-A-CH.: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15b5ZLN3ChRy8RKqTOpfmYLZ5sZtmJJ62RZ0u-B7ZWd4/edit The discussion that followed illuminated pros, cons, and nagging questions surround the adoption of a vocabulary list like this: Pros
Cons
Nagging Questions
Agreements
|
present? | Name | Organization |
---|---|---|
Alice Krim | ||
x | Ann-Marie Breaux | |
x | Ann Kardos | UMass Amherst |
x | Charlotte Whitt | |
x | Christie Thomas | |
Damian Biagi | ||
Dennis Christman | ||
Dracine Hodges | ||
x | Felix Hemme | |
Filip Jakobsen | ||
X | Jacquie Samples | Duke University |
Jason Kovari | ||
Jessica Janecki | ||
Kimie Ou Yang | ||
x | Laura Wright | |
x | Lisa Furubotten | |
x | Lisa McColl | |
Lisa Sjögren | ||
x | Lynn Whittenberger | |
x | Mary Alexander | Univ. of Alabama |
x | Natascha Owens | |
Niels Erik Nielsen | ||
x | Patty Wanninger | |
Sarah Schmidt | ||
x | Tiziana Possemato | |
x | Jenn Colt | |
x | Sarah Ross | |
x | Martina Schildt | |
x | Sara Colglazier | MHC/5C |