Page Comparison

Jenn Colt is next, followed by Florian Gleixner 

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

All

• Jira Legacy
  server System JiraJIRA serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc key TCR-33

  - update from Jenn Colt?
  • PC still discussing
  • Some discussion about it having UI in settings, front end may get adjustments. Some discussion about whether to go ahead and work in parallel with PC just to have more time. Will proceed.

  • Jira Legacy
    server System JiraJIRA serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc key TCR-35

    - Jeremy Huff will take

  • Jira Legacy
    server System JiraJIRA serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc key TCR-36

    - Jeremy Huff as well

  • Jira Legacy
    server System JiraJIRA serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc key TCR-37

      - Jeremy Huff Ingolf Kuss
  • Jeremy will work out what order/whether to do in sequence/parallel to work on these. Starting on TCR-37 probably makes the most sense since it is lowest level.
  • DCB getting more PC discussion as well
  • Moving forward on these due to time constraints
  • There are many TCRs for Q. Is this something we should flag? Can TC get them all done? Practically we need to be able to work in parallel with PC.
  • Did we drop the explicit contact from PC from the TCR process?
  • TCR group will consider all these sequencing issues and try to figure out a recommendation

Maccabee Levine Tod Olson  Jakub Skoczen  Craig McNally Jenn Colt 

• CC: Maccabee Levine
  • No meeting this week
• PC: Tod Olson 
  • Presentation related to mod-batch-print, discussion focused largely on how the batch print jobs for reminder notices are exposed in the UI and whether the module itself is optional.
  • Presentation on Direct Consortial Borrowing, did not get to discussion.
  • See 2024-01-11 Product Council Meeting Agenda and Notes for links to slide decks, etc.
• RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen 
• Security Team: Craig McNally No updates, triaging issues.
  • No important updates - business as usual
• Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt  
  • Work continuing

• 17 Jan 2024 - Regular TC meeting (instead of Monday 15th)
• 18 Jan 2024 - Tri-Council meeting
• 22 Jan 2024 - Regular TC meeting
• 24 Jan 2024 - Topic TBD

All

Quick updates only.  If we can't find volunteers for groups, we'll need to add the topic to our backlog and address it during dedicated discussion sessions.

• Configuration group - RFC has been created so close subgroup and move work to the RFC for configuration, will work on composing the group
• Breaking changes - have volunteers Ankita, Zak, Jeremy. Will sort out their next steps
• Translations - conversations in council
• TCRs - group still meeting
• Application formalization RF draft - Craig will work on

All

• Status/Updates:
  • 0004 Date-time values must comply with IETF RFC-3339
    • Closed with a note - thank you Zak Burke 
    • Should we re-open & merge the PR so that the RFC can be seen in the master branch?
    • Zak Burketo update the Outcome to CLOSED and merge so it can be found later on
    • Marc Johnson comments regarding PAUSED state
    • This is done!
  • Application Formalization RFC - DRAFT REFINEMENT PR:  https://github.com/folio-org/rfcs/pull/22
  • Go Programming Language for Backend Development RFC - PRELIMINARY REVIEW PR: https://github.com/folio-org/rfcs/pull/25 - need to check in
  • Distributed vs Centralized Configuration RFC - DRAFT REFINEMENT PR: https://github.com/folio-org/rfcs/pull/26 - needs group formed, may inherit from the subgroup some folks

RFC Process Improvements:

• We need another RFC to update the metadata retroactively to reflect the new or adjusted statuses. - Jenn Colt will do this, hasn't finished yet
  
  • Any volunteers?
  • Holding off on this for now - maybe someone will volunteer after the holidays.

Notes:

The announcements were made before the holidays.  Has anyone received questions / comments on this?  

• Ingolf Kuss this has not been addressed at the sysops group yet
• Craig McNally will bump the threads to try to get more feedback

Notes:

no objections from sysops

no other feedback or objections

Standing agenda item... is there anything in the decision log requiring attention?

Standing agenda item to review/discuss any requested or required changes to officially supported technology lists

• Check in on progress... does anything else require attention?
• Next Important Milestone:  Review Ramsons (3rd party dependencies) and move from DRAFT → ACCEPTED by 16 Feb 2024 
  • Maybe we should aim to start looking at this on 05 Feb 2024 so we have time for discussion/adjustments.
• Versions for the components:
  • Resume discussion at an upcoming dedicated topic discussion?