Versions Compared

Old Version 12

changes.mady.by.user Jacquie Samples

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Lisa McColl

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Remote Storage Integration Small Group

Cate Boerema (Deactivated)

With Anastasiia Zakharova(Stacy) putting together a small group on the topic of remote storage. Looking for Subject Matter Specialists to join the group. Feel free to go directly to the new wiki page <Remote storage integration subgroup> Please put on the page your area of expertise. Feel free to contact Anastasiia Zakharova on Slack with any questions you have.

Subgroup & other updates/announcements?

No announcements

Bound-with Subgroup update (continued from 2020-07-23)

Laura E Daniels Jessica Janecki Felix Hemme Natascha Owens

Slides

Proposing a change to the data model that will allow one item to be associated with more than one holdings record.

Continued beginning on Slide 19 of slide deck linked above.

End of day August 5th, please contact Charlotte, Felix,  Natascha or Jessica with concerns.

Notes from chat:

From Ann Kardos (she/her) to Everyone: 12:26 PM
Why can’t we just say “The title you requested is included in a volume with these titles: list of titles"
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:27 PM
In the case of special collections, the request would be mediated through a public-service person, who can communicate the fact that there are other titles
From scolglaz@mtholyoke.edu to Everyone: 12:27 PM
I like what Ann suggested
From Ann Kardos (she/her) to Everyone: 12:30 PM
I don’t find it that mysterious either, and at some point there may be a public service person mediating this So I think something simple just describing that the piece someone wants is included with other titles is sufficient.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:30 PM
"Bound-with" is more specific than "With". You can have something "With" accompanying material that is not bound
From Jacquie Samples to Everyone: 12:31 PM
I agree Felicia, but on that point, wouldn't these also circulate together? That word would then serve more than one purpose.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:33 PM
Well, in MARC the 501 "With" note is more specific, meaning issued that way by the publisher or printer, as opposed to several titles bound together after publication
From Jacquie Samples to Everyone: 12:33 PM
Also, thinking of "filmed with" I think that the note should only include the first title.
From Felicia Piscitelli to Everyone: 12:38 PM
I think Having an item record connect to multiple holdings will be helpful. If you leke, I can send you some really tricky examples from our catalog
From Laura Wright (she/her) to Everyone: 12:39 PM
Sure, that would be great


Further discussion on migration of bound-withs to Folio.

Future MM meetings (ongoing)

Add ideas here

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit


...