Page Comparison

 Ingolf Kuss is next, followed by Maccabee Levine

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

Maccabee Levine

Tod Olson

Jakub Skoczen

Craig McNally

Jenn Colt 

• CC: Maccabee Levine 
  
  • no meeting today
• PC: Tod Olson (for last two weeks)
  • Upcoming PC elections and recruiting candidates. Existential questions.
  • WOLFcon proposals
  • Next steps on FOLIO topics from the China community, with focus on how to get the product issues to the POs
  • Planning for architectural and authentication changes discussed in 2024-04-24 - Architectural PoC, wondering about effects on roadmap.
• RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen
  • a request for potential rfcs
• Security Team: Craig McNally
• Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt
  • Week off in favor of attending TC meeting on Wednesday
  • things have been repeated incorrectly. Straightening things out.

• TCR-38: Florian Gleixner
  • ready for review by the TC
  • does it have to be in the main platform distribution ? → question for release planning group
  • if we approve it, it will be in the Ramsons release
  • some confusion because of naming: edge-erm wraps mod-agreements, but FOLIO EBSCO ERM is something completely different.
  • TC members voted and this module was accepted into Ramsons

• 01 May 2024 - Dedicated Discussion - Communicating Breaking Changes
  • cancelled because of international holiday
• 06 May 2024 - Regular TC meeting
• 08 May 2024 - Dedicated Discussion - Architectural PoC Q&A continued
• 13 May 2024 - Regular TC meeting

All

All

Standing agenda item to review/discuss any requested or required changes to officially supported technology lists

• old version of FOLIO: Goldenrod
• problems supporting CNMARC; Problem with marc4j or with the FOLIO code ? Owen: A marc4j issue: github.com/marc4j
• some of these things might have been fixed in later versions, already; we won't fix them in Goldenrod
• Chinese community ready to move forward to some more recent version, if there is enough reason to do so
• significant changes in circulation and orders
• things about authentication that might be addressed through Keycloak
• will the Chinese community update their fork or will they get back to the mainline development branch ?
• Tod will be able to bring that (feedback) back
• Marc: some things not in the TC purview. Significant changes in circulation. It will be a lot of work to get back.
• Marc: We haven't touched some fundamental things which presented them challenges. There were process differences.
• Maccabee: Why did they fork years ago ? It makes no sense to speculate here.
• Craig: Let us get the fundamental questions answered first, otherwise it will be a waist of time.
• Jenn: Let us have a Wednesday meeting about that and have Patrick there.

Actions:

Tod Olson to bring some of these questions back to the PC and the group being formed around this topic.

• Will the Chinese community update their fork or will they get back to the mainline development branch ?
• Is the expectation that we'd backport some of these enhancements to Goldenrod?  Or that they will upgrade to a newer version of Folio?

Update: Gang Zhou confirmed the Chinese FOLIO community would like these to be addressed in current FOLIO development, not back-ported. 

Review the topics on our Topic Backlog to remove those that are no longer relevant, modify those that require change, and add topics that might be missing.