went well. following up with PC on overlapping proposals related to the potential development/product positions. Innovation grant and security audit also got interest.
CC is going to provide more direction but we are proceeding on work with for the dev advocate and PO role proposals with PC in the meantime
updates from the PC:
no meeting last week
PC meeting on June 1 will be about Data Import and actions EBSCO is organizing to address issues.
trying to get some more attention on the RFC, cast a wider net to get comments
Looking for feedback on how breaking communications will be communicated, right now they have spent a ton of time on that aspect. Considering wrapping up and moving the comms piece to phase 2 with a second group.
Improvement on TCR process:
working on libraries and plug ins. don't want to upend previous work so looking for low impact way to provide most guidance they can on those topics without being distruptive
need to update the presentation to include those and then give the presentation ASAP
then pass off further work to next iteration of the group
hoping to show presentation updates to the group tomorrow so likely back to TC next week and then wider community
Java 17
What's blocking it? Time/capacity now, but anticipating capacity increase
Distributed configuration
wiki started, info added, no next meeting scheduled yet
might be a monday meeting?
Mike Taylor was working on rewording deprecation statement
working on docs for group members to preread so they can be prepared for the meeting
Monday meeting helped, Julian said his comments can be resolved, and they have been
Moved forward to final review without objections
Cleanup effort required:
filename prefix - all RFCs currently use 0000- defeating the purpose
conflicting process documentation between the wiki and github...
renaming can be done by RFC submitters, leave comments on the RFCs that still need it
Jenn will take on the documentation clean up
5-10 min
Officially Supported Technologies - Upkeep
All
Craig McNally successfully locked down the pages so that only TC members can edit
Craig McNally will roll out the headers to the remaining pages
Today:
Review the status of this effort
Review the page status enumeration from the perspective of how/when/which modules are affected
Lock down is done, headers are there and now labels are added so things are appearing as they should be! Good progress.
Does "accepting" imply once and done or can things circle back through the statuses? How do we expect the statuses to drive what we are going to do? What process ties the statuses together?
It would be helpful to have a workflow diagram (like what JIRA has) about how the statuses transition from one to another. Need something written down.
As far as new modules, trying to show only the active one applies to a module being released right now
Some process is needed because of impact on scope. Impact can be at product level because of scope but the knowledge is at the dev level.
RFC too heavyweight for these decisions
Due diligence/communication to not surprise people
Who needs to be told? PO meeting and they communicate back
Bring to a monday meeting
ADRs might be a good solution
Should move Poppy to active, need to get Quesnalia up soon
is a holiday for many - TC dedicated topic discussion has been cancelled
will be used to discuss the security concerns around consortia / cross-tenant support, relaxing the tenant check
topic TBD
is an EBSCO holiday - what about others?
Topic Backlog
*reminder*
Terminology Document
All
Craig McNally the term "platform" is something that we wanted to revisit but the terminology document otherwise has been accepted by the three councils
Jenn Colt has been talking with Marc Johnson on Slack and was thinking that could be part of a larger conversation about architecture
Marc Johnson is okay leading this conversation and rolling it into the Architecture discussion, we could use platform as the first topic on the Architecture sub-group