Versions Compared

Version Old Version 14 New Version Current
Changes made by

Joanne Leary

Joanne Leary

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals
5 minHousekeepingAndrea Loigman
15minNotices

Darcy Branchini

Multiple items single notice/increments for sendingBetter understand the expectations and interdependencies around requirements of these tightly linked issues. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Xnb7j-xt0CZrgD9zRuH3OBX_bxR8FNl94F52Lom9gM/edit#gid=0
10 minCreation of MVPHolly MistlebauerAt the D.C. meeting the Product Council charged the Capacity Planning Team to identify a Market-Viable Product (MVP)
  • Hopefully this isn't new news to you!
  • MVP will be a solid set of features–technically sound with good performance
  • Many features identified as needed at go-live will not be included
    • We don't have enough time to do everything between now and January 1st
    • But we will identify workarounds for missing go-live features
    • Each institution will need to decide if the MVP plus workarounds will be o.k. for them
  • The POs will take the information from these ranking exercises to identify priority order and nominate top features for MVP
  • After the Capacity Plan is created, additional cuts will most likely be needed–the Capacity Planning Team will work with the POs and SIGs to figure out what to do
  • Devs will be reallocated as needed to get the work done
30 minFees/FinesHolly Mistlebauer  Re-ranking fee/fine features

Review for Fee/Fine UXPROD features for possible re-ranking

(Please open the spreadsheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17muqftBy3M1BRA4bedbSHeUI1v8oG4KCMES1uf3QG1k/edit?usp=sharing to work along with Holly)

...

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019







Notes

RA SIG 7-11-19

Darcy discussed the criteria for having multiple items on a single notice:

...

State of development: the current situation is that we have too many go-live issues and need to identify the ones that are the highest priority in order to have a market-viable product (MVP). The Capacity Planning Team is trying to resolve performance issues and come out the with an MVP by January 1. The product would satisfy basic needs or provide workarounds. Libraries would decide whether they want to go live on that basis. The highest priority after January 1 is to fix bugs and to work on needed features. On 8/19/19, the team will present what they have so far to the Product Owners.

...

Fine Fees: Holly asks us to look at the Fine Fee Ranking spreadsheet (link above) and note the ones highlighted in yellow. Is the ranking correct? If not, change and update in JIRA. Ranking scale: highest number is the most important. Some discussion about the behavior of Claims Returned: fines should be suspended when that a CLMR status is applied, but the fine is only calculated after the item is returned/discharged. Need to have a discussion on whether/how to charge or not charge fine.