...
Feature |
| ||||||||||||||||
Release | Sunflower | ||||||||||||||||
Document status |
|
| Table of Contents | ||
|---|---|---|
|
...
Document business expectations? Where do we differ from AcquistionsAcquisitions? Some examples:
ECS handling - change ownership
Setting record for deletion
Default display (sort, number to display, how to go through more history) - endless scroll? More?
Document some user workflows (i.e. Single record overlay)
Work with Kimie to revise UX (
)Lref gdrive file url https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/17ghSSy1kvLOVGO8JzFyFJXfjbJHt8mo6 Remove “sort by”
Remove examples where the app is identified as the trigger for the change
Write user stories
...
Ability to rollback to and/or view previous versions
Ability to sort
Including the app that triggered the change
Exporting version history
Highlighting the fields changed
Tech design
Requirements overview
Requirement | Notes | Jira(s) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feature toggle so that libraries can set whether the feature is enabled (applies to both FOLIO and MARC source records) |
| ||
| 2 | Include version history on both the :
| |||
| 3 | Display the date and time of the change in local timezone | |||
| 4 | Display the source of the change (user vs system) | |||
| 5 | Identify as a “Change”, and indicate whether the field was:
| |||
| 6 | Indicate the field changed on Instances detail view for both FOLIO and MARC source records. Note: for MARC source records, the field changed should reflect the Instance field changed (see other requirement for Source view) | |||
| 7 | In Source view for MARC source records, identify the specific MARC fields (not to the point of indicators or subfields) changed | |||
| 8 | Record change after the record has been opened (edited) for the first time | 9If a MARC field is changed that does NOT map to a FOLIO instance, do not include the change in the Instance detail view log | ||
| 9 | Ignore changes to metadata | |||
| 10 | Only include 15 changes in the log at a time |
| ||
| 11 | Present a toast message that loading additional changes may take time | |||
| 12 | Holdings & item deletion - Log in the audit |
Questions
Question | Answer | Date | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the mockups, the user name is hyperlinked - does this just go to the user record? | Yes |
| ||||||||
| 2 | Assuming that the highlight of fields changed (as implemented by Acquisitions) should be considered out of scope? | Yes |
| ||||||||
| 3 | Do we indicate when one record is updated from changes made to another record (such as updating the call number on a holdings record which then updates the effective call number on the item record)? | If there is a field that is autogenerated/updated, needs to be reflected in item version history |
| ||||||||
| 4 | Do we include a change of “Shared” for ECS? | Yes. If a local record is shared, include a change of promoted to shared |
| ||||||||
| 5 | Do we include a change of “Derived” and “Duplicate” | Yes |
| ||||||||
| 6 | Do we include a change if
| Yes |
| ||||||||
| 7 | Is keeping one year of history sufficient? Potentially need some sort of workflow where a user can make a call to some sort of archive to get more history? | Needs further discussion | |||||||||
| 8 | Do we need to track when fields are reordered in quickMARC? | Yes - indicate field and a action of “Moved”? - Ping acq about what they’re doing if:
| |||||||||
| 9 | Confirm whether there will be changes logged when records are linked together? (might show with parent/child?) | ||||||||||
| 10 | Confirm whether a tag added to holdings will be reflected in change log | ||||||||||
| 11 | Confirm whether the linking of authorities to bibs be reflected in change log | ||||||||||
| 12 | Do we need to implement this issue (
| Requires Kalibek Turgumbayev to review question. | |||||||||
| 13 | What is the impact of implementing these issues https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODINVSTOR-1207 and https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODINVSTOR-1268 after UXPROD-4125 or UXPROD-4126? | Requires Kalibek Turgumbayev to review question. |