<5 mins | Introductions | |
| Call Priorities | Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2645 |
---|
|
- Owen to test using Cypress
- Needs non-prod environment to run Cypress on against these tests
- Followups:
|
| WIP Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE:
- Progress / Impediments:
- TODO:
- New unknowns:
- Help or input needed:
- ETA for review:
|
- What progress or impediment on previously stated actions?
- What's left to do?
- Any new unknowns?
- What help or input is needed?
- When expected to be ready for review?
| In Progress Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2630 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- expecting some external service to use Gokb scrollAPI in chunks of 5000 packages (not content items), managing state and queue position
- treating cursor/state as black box for now
- should be able to use schemas/shapes mostly as-is
- add package id to contentSchema
- add comment t
- will end up with 2 parallel ways to get data in
- scheduled harvest for package ingest (current)
- push service (this piece)
- will need to refactor package ingest (harvest) service to separate out reusable ingest functionality
- support either harvest or push (not both) for an ingest
- external push service will use TIPPs to set up content items, linking them to known content rather than creating new ones
- provides transactional redundancy
- provides a restart point
- reduce performance burden on agreements
- so far:
- 2 trivial endpoints set up under `erm/pushkb`
- TODO:
- get endpoints accepting/logging out json input
- started
- not wired through okapi as shape uincertain
- can hit locally, passsing list of packages and log them out to a package schema
- therefore package schema is accepting this approach
- split schema to interdependently (1) expect and (2) not expect ...
- wire schema into ingest process
- dig into ingest process to plan refactoring
- New unknowns:
- Help or input needed:
- Input needed from Ian to understand legacy technical decisions around, eg, remote kb, source/ref push/pull
- To follow up on Thursday with Ian re domain model and shape of future shape/behaviour of external service
- ETA for review:
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2612 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- ready for passed to code reviewJira issue
- needs test data to be relocated to central file
- TODO: ETA for review: now
- Ethan to stub new Jira for multiselect and delete ERM-2612
- New unknowns / Help or input needed: NA
Jira- Progress / Impediments:
- used a popular 3rd party library
- to create and use a sanitised link - didn't work
- TODO:
- check whether href accepts object or string only
- need to remove the js from the href element to avoid
- check for other uri sanity packages
- check with Hongwei/Julian on potential solution/package
- New unknowns:
JIRA | serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key |
---|
|
SI-12 | - New unknowns / Help or input needed: NA
- ETA for review: now
|
| Pending Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE
- Blocking conditions
- Action needed
|
- Are the blocking conditions still relevant?
- What action is needed to unblock, and by whom?
Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE:
- Who / When:
- ETA Ready for Dev:
|
- Who needs to be involved in the elaboration process?
- What is the timeframe for getting input?
- When is the issue expected to be ready for development?
- Who is picking up what next?
- When is next issue expected to start / complete?
- Anything needed to start next issue (dependencies or clarifications)?
| BlockedNA Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2645 |
---|
|
- OS to ask Khalilah and hosted-ref-environments
Needs Elaboration / TriageSprint Backlog - Next Up Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2643 |
---|
|
Allocations- Claudia:
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-17952643 |
---|
|
- Ethan:
- Release Tasks Jira
JIRA | serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM- |
---|
|
2643 JiraJIRA | serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2648 |
---|
|
JiraJIRA | serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2649 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-26402643 |
---|
|
- Monireh:
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2612 |
---|
|
|
| At Risk - What is now at risk of not being started this sprint?
- Do any of these take priority over other sprint backlog items?
| Sprint Backlog - to followSprint Backlog - At Risk Removed |
| In Review - Any impediments to review or QA?
- Any useful context, implementation choices or limitations for the reviewer/tester to know ?
| Code Review:NA Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2633 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2612 |
---|
|
- refdata for tests need to be removed from test resources and added to central test data file
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2624 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2625 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | SI-12 |
---|
|
- found it requires opening in a new window
- pushed to QA
QA / UAT Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2506 |
---|
|
|
| Release Candidates - What has passed QA since last dev call?
- What has been closed since last dev call?
| For Release / Pending TestrailsClosed: Poppy R2023.2Stories / BugsMaintenance / TasksRelease TasksClosed: Orchid R2023.1 Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2626 |
---|
|
Closed: Orchid R2023.1 Bugfix Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2642 |
---|
|
Closed (No ERM Release) |
| AOB
| New Issues - New unexpected Proxy Settings behaviour
- If no proxy setting set, prompts for unsaved changes when navigating away
- handleCancel → onDelete → onDelete
- needs logic to reset form if field length < 1
- remove onDelete call from handleCancel
- However, better to rewrite away from Card to MCL
JiraJIRA | serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM- |
---|
|
2646- Have we got another grails-okapi issue in play or pending?
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2792 |
---|
|
Added to sprint Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2647 |
---|
| / Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | SI-12 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-1795 |
---|
|
Not added to sprint Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2644 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2792 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2793 |
---|
|
Other- Owen and Gill to review potential UX consistency issues to bring into release cycle
Component UpdatesRelease Planning- Orchid Bugfix tests to follow ERM-2643
Testing- describe permissions as part of test scenarios
Security |