...
Requirement | Notes | Jira(s) | |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Feature toggle so that libraries can set whether the feature is enabled (applies to both FOLIO and MARC source records) |
| |
2 | Include version history on:
| ||
3 | Display the date and time of the change in local timezone | ||
4 | Display the source of the change (user vs system) | ||
5 | Identify as a “Change”, and indicate whether the field was:
| ||
6 | Indicate the field changed on Instances detail view for both FOLIO and MARC source records. Note: for MARC source records, the field changed should reflect the Instance field changed (see other requirement for Source view) | ||
7 | In Source view for MARC source records, identify the specific MARC fields (not to the point of indicators or subfields) changed | ||
8 | If a MARC field is changed that does NOT map to a FOLIO instance, do not include the change in the Instance detail view log | ||
9 | Ignore changes to metadata | ||
10 | Only include 15 changes cards in the log at a time in the instance history view |
| |
11 | Present a toast message that loading additional changes may take time | ||
12 | Holdings & item deletion - Log in the audit |
Questions
Question | Answer | Refinement Notes (1/9/24) | Answer Date | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | In the mockups, the user name is hyperlinked - does this just go to the user record? | Yes |
| |||||||||
2 | Assuming that the highlight of fields changed (as implemented by Acquisitions) should be considered out of scope? | Yes |
| |||||||||
3 | Do we indicate when one record is updated from changes made to another record (such as updating the call number on a holdings record which then updates the effective call number on the item record)? | If there is a field that is autogenerated/updated, needs to be reflected in item version history |
| |||||||||
4 | Do we include a change of “Shared” for ECS? | Yes. If a local record is shared, include a change of promoted to shared |
|
| ||||||||
5 | Do we include a change of “Derived” and “Duplicate”? | Yes |
*could be similar to effort of “via” line that we omitted |
| ||||||||
6 | Do we include a change if
| Yes |
|
| ||||||||
7 | Is keeping one year of history sufficient? Potentially need some sort of workflow where a user can make a call to some sort of archive to get more history? | Needs further discussion |
| |||||||||
8 | Do we need to track when fields are reordered in quickMARC? | Yes - indicate field and a an action of “Moved”? - Ping acq about what they’re doing if:
| ||||||||||
9 | Confirm whether there will be changes logged when records are linked together? (might show with parent/child?) | |||||||||||
10 | Confirm whether a tag added to holdings will be reflected in change log | |||||||||||
11 | Confirm whether the linking of authorities to bibs be reflected in change log | |||||||||||
12 | Do we need to implement this issue (
| Requires Kalibek Turgumbayev to review question. | ||||||||||
13 | What is the impact of implementing these issues https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODINVSTOR-1207 and https://folio-org.atlassian.net/browse/MODINVSTOR-1268 after UXPROD-4125 or UXPROD-4126? | Requires Kalibek Turgumbayev to review question. | ||||||||||
14 | Requirement for showing only 15 cards at one time (need UI requirements)
| |||||||||||
15 | How do we show change history when the multiple fields are changed? |
| ||||||||||
16 | Will we add the highlighted fields on the record in the future? |
| ||||||||||
17 | Will we add the rollback capability in the future? |
| ||||||||||
18 | Do we include bound-width changes? |