...
Requirement | Notes | Jira(s) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Feature toggle so that libraries can set whether the feature is enabled (applies to both FOLIO and MARC source records) |
| |
| 2 | Include version history on both the :
| ||
| 3 | Display the date and time of the change in local timezone | ||
| 4 | Display the source of the change (user vs system) | ||
| 5 | Identify as a “Change”, and indicate whether the field was:
| ||
| 6 | Indicate the field changed on Instances detail view for both FOLIO and MARC source records. Note: for MARC source records, the field changed should reflect the Instance field changed (see other requirement for Source view) | ||
| 7 | In Source view for MARC source records, identify the specific MARC fields (not to the point of indicators or subfields) changed | ||
| 8 | If a MARC field is changed that does NOT map to a FOLIO instance, do not include the change in the Instance detail view log | ||
| 9 | Record changes after the record has been opened (edited) for the first time |
...
Question | Answer | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the mockups, the user name is hyperlinked - does this just go to the user record? | ||
| 2 | Assuming that the highlight of fields changed (as implemented by Acquisitions) should be considered out of scope? | ||
| 3 | Do we indicate when one record is updated from changes to made to another record (such as updating the call number on a holdings record which then updates the effective call number on the item record)? | ||
| 4 | Do we include a change of “Shared” for ECS? | ||
| 5 | Do we include a change of “Derived”? | ||
| 6 | Do we include a change if the holdings ownership has changed in ECS? |