Page Comparison

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

Maccabee Levine

Tod Olson

Jakub Skoczen

Craig McNally

Jenn Colt 

• CC: Maccabee Levine: 
  • CC approved projected FY25 budget. Single-year budget over by about $100k, but lots of carryover from prior years to break even without dipping into reserves. AWS budget $130k more than FY24, but expected to go down again FY26, specifics TBD.  No decisions yet on future of dev advocate (FY25 or FY26) timing but CC reiterated past support.
  • Budget yet O.K. Release Management Stakeholders (RMS) group, a call for broader participation. Stephen Pampell joined.
    

    Lref gdrive file
    url https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1pHhJ1rdX6E-G-xRuZMqePVPy0gUF755wWsuuvG5xiPY/edit?gid=534213076#gid=534213076

  • Stephen Pampell (TAMU) joining RMSG.
• PC: Tod Olson
  • Trying to get a decision in 2 weeks, but probably not before the New Year. ... PC re-meets this Thursday.
• RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen:
  • Nothing to follow up.
• Security Team: Craig McNally:
  • Reminder to please review Proposal for a Deprecation Policy for FOLIO Modules outside of the official supported set with a Severe Security Vulnerability and provide feedback.
  • Nothing else to mention here.
• Tri-council Application Formalization/Eureka:   Jenn Colt
  • ..Eureka was discussed in Wednesday meeting. This Wednesday it will be the topic again.

• 18 Dec 2024 - Possible topics:  Developer advocate retro, Voting rules, Eureka adoption
• 23 Dec 2024 - Regular TC meeting (Probably Cancel?)
• 25 Dec 2024 -  Cancel
• 30 Dec 2024 - Regular TC meeting (Probably Cancel?)
• 01.01. Cancel
• 06 Jan 2025 - CancelRegular TC
• 08.01.2025 (Wednesday) (Possible topics:  Developer advocate retro, Voting rules)

• https://github.com/folio-org/tech-council/pulls

Julian Ladisch: All TC members should review these pull requests

Marc Johnson: This is unusual, subgroups were used before, but if this is the way we should update documentation is OK.

Maccabee Levine: very good and helpful PRs. Some need discussion, a wednesday would be great. Or a subgroup.

TC members should take a look at the PRs before.

Fast overview:

Needs discussion:

• PR75
• PR86
• PR73 - there has been some discussion, subgroup did not agree
• PR79

Merged:

• PR71

Easy ones should be resolvable on next monday, others need a discussion next year.

Today:

All

• ...

Nothing new

Check Recurring Calendar...

Craig McNally Jenn Colt clean up OST and calendar

• See proposals: Voting Rule Comparisons
• Jenn Colt added a feature comparison table
• Ingolf Kuss: calling a vote can be dangerous if there are only 6 or 7 members which hinders people from casting a vote.
• Marc Johnson: do we want to have a good decision or a fast decision
• Jenn Colt: we have no rules for bringing up a vote again or spamming the agenda. We do not need bad or slow decisions, but we need clear rules
• Marc Johnson: differences when a motion is not carried
• Florian Gleixner: re-voting on the same topic should not be allowed without changing content