...
Convener & notes: Martina Schildt
Next meeting:
ERM implementers:Please addquestions, requirements and ERM implementers' topics.
Product Council meeting notes
\uD83E\uDD45 Homework
Will be added
Lref gdrive file url https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zkqbma0EPdyDfsHy8M_vk4ILxLQbCTEmd_1mN8sJqRc/edit?usp=sharing
\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics
Development progress update
eUsage App: Future development plans
Implementers' topic: URL validationURLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents
📔 Minutes
Time | Item | Presenter | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
10min | Development progress update | ||
15min | eUsage App - future development plans | ||
35minImplementers' topic: URL validation | URLs in Agreements and LIcenses documents | With the Q release, the validation of URL fields in Agreements and Licenses has changed. The URLs to wikis and Jiras, which only resolve internally, are no longer validated. Same happens to file paths. As a result, libraries can no longer save the records where they have entered respective information in the URL field. Wish: add another field for URLs that don’t fit the validation criteria. Alternative: allow flexibility in validation Example values from ZBW that we’re storing in our agreements and licenses. We’re not neccessarily keen to add all of those data into the URL field. With Quesnelia, the only appropriate field is labled “Physical description” what seems a bit odd. Maybe this field could be renamed to support all kinds of “non urls”.
|
...