Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

[Marc Johnson is next followed by Julian Ladisch]

Julian today, Marc next

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

60 minTC Voting rulesAll

Background:

Ingolf and Jason would like the same voting rules that other councils use.

Maccabee points out that TC has agreed that Slack voting is allowed, but only after a possibility for discussion.

Craig don't want to change the voting rules whenever the TC member changes.

Jenn: Without Slack voting peope are motiviated to attend the meetings.

Ingolf: Knowlegable abstention is quite different from an absent member not voting.

Jakub: We might have a standard rule and the option that any member can request a higher quorum.

Craig: If absent members sent a proxy we can keep the 7 votes rule.

If a majority of a quorum decides this can be a small fraction of the TC; this seems odd for serious decisions.

Marc: Some people have a problem to find a proxy. The chairs might designate a proxy if the member doesn't provides a proxy.

Jakub: The quorum is needed to have a informed decision by getting feedback from all groups represented in the TC.

Tod: A proxy can not only be from the same organisation, it can be another TC member or a person from a different organisation. And Slack voting should be allowed.

There are different opinions whether Slack voting slows down the decision making.

Do we want Slack only voting, or Slack voting as a fallback when we don't reach a quorum/majority in the meeting.

An abstention can cause a loss of a quorum, this is more powerful than a no, but as powerful as an absent.


Zoom Chat







...