Versions Compared

Old Version 9

changes.mady.by.user Kirstin Kemner-Heek

Saved on

compared with

New Version 10

changes.mady.by.user Simeon Warner

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ItemWhoNotes
Treasurer's update

Paula Sullenger 

Delayed from before winter break

  • All membership fees are paid! (star)
  • Budget looks good
Outreach and Marketing WG

Boaz Nadav Manes 

Ref. COM WG charge from 2023: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZTOUOhwUtWaEjywKkS0cA41t1h0Wzhv_F9FR5Cyhqzk/edit

  • Working group reporting to CC, 7-8 members 
  • Definition of themes per year and follow up
  • Rachel and Boaz are founding members → ACTION ITEM: find volunteers
    • marketing profs 
  • 2024: 
    • Focus on Innovation
    • Youtubes, forums, global insight


Other Business



Backlog of topics to discuss
FOLIO Developer Advocate

Mike Gorrell 

Before break we had 2 candidates (both from outside FOLIO)
Action items to follow up with
FOLIO System Administration and DevOpsMike Gorrell  

Index Data needs to pull back from some System Administration tasks - we will end our support by March 1, 2024. Announced and first discussed 2023-11-27 Community Council Meeting notes, next step is a list of duties to transition, then develop a plan, aim to have candidate teams by February 1.

Community survey

Tom Cramer 

Survey closed Friday Sep 29. Tom shared a first draft / summary of grouped items in 2023-11-27 Community Council Meeting notes 

NEXT STEPS:

  • Tom, Maccabee, Jesse - will produce summary to share early in the new year
  • All - feel free to add comments as you read/review, can also suggest new high-level categories
Community communication norms

Tom Cramer Ian Ibbotson (Use this one) Christopher Spalding 

From 2023-08-25 Meeting notes

  • idea about changing the ask on SIG's!  Information and discussion in the SIGs and a transport of summaries to upper levels
  • asking how communication flows across the project, new people don't know, need some guidance for the project
  • no update
Architecture group

Ian Ibbotson (Use this one) (liaison to CC)

Addendum from Ian - 28th Nov.

I didn't think it was worth taking peoples time in the call with an update so posting here - Formally: the group has met twice and is trying to define it's scope - I don't think there is consensus yet.

Informally: I felt the last meeting we had was possibly one of the most constructive governance meetings we've had in a long time. A lot of the structural challenges we have were talked about (The way the three-council split can lead us into undecidable propositions). I felt we strayed into some old archetypes "The end users aren't consulted", and "Concern over derailment of the TC process". But then it felt like we started to synthesize a scope for a tri-council group as a group tasked with understanding a proposal, communicating it to the wider community, gathering and organising feedback, and then communicating that feedback to the source. TBC but I think the meetings are worthwhile - we didn't get into the detail of the app architecture itself, but progress on the question of what a tri-council group is/should be and how it relates to this specific question.