<5 mins | Introductions | |
| Call Priorities |
|
| WIP Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE:
- Progress / Impediments:
- TODO:
- New unknowns:
- Help or input needed:
- ETA for review:
|
- What progress or impediment on previously stated actions?
- What's left to do?
- Any new unknowns?
- What help or input is needed?
- When expected to be ready for review?
| In Progress Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2288 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- See Slack input from Steve
- handling `pkg.save(failOnError:true)` doesn't work on its own
- Exception happening now for contentTypes, and doesn't reach alternateResourceNames (previously only alternateResourceNames)
- TODO:
- try adding `Pkg.get`
- Restructure method into multiple methods
- Refactor scope: only the bits for this issue
- New unknowns:
- Help or input needed: continue on thread
- ETA for review: ?
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2308 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- using subValue property
- however, keyValue subValue text is italicised in component styling
- TODO: add list class
- New unknowns: NA
- Help or input needed: NA
- ETA for review: today
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2309 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- added multiSelect control (copied from Tags)
- multiple selection not working though
- typo onClearFilter: resolved
- TODO: extend tests
- New unknowns: none
- Help or input needed: none
- ETA for review: today
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2314 |
---|
|
- Progress / Impediments:
- begun
- needed some refactoring to enable development on it
- TODO: all
- New unknowns: NA
- Help or input needed: NA
- ETA for review: next Wed
|
| Pending Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE
- Blocking conditions
- Action needed
|
- Are the blocking conditions still relevant?
- What action is needed to unblock, and by whom?
Expand |
---|
| - ISSUE:
- Who / When:
- ETA Ready for Dev:
|
- Who needs to be involved in the elaboration process?
- What is the timeframe for getting input?
- When is the issue expected to be ready for development?
- Who is picking up what next?
- When is next issue expected to start / complete?
- Anything needed to start next issue (dependencies or clarifications)?
| BlockedNeeds ElaborationSprint Backlog - Next Up- Claudia: ?
Ethan: Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2093 |
---|
|
- Monireh: NA
- Peter:
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2311 |
---|
|
- Owen
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2332 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2333 |
---|
|
|
| At Risk - What is now at risk of not being started this sprint?
- Do any of these take priority over other sprint backlog items?
| Sprint Backlog - to follow Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2330 |
---|
|
Sprint Backlog - At Risk Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2311 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2093 |
---|
|
|
| In Review - Any impediments to review or QA?
- Any useful context, implementation choices or limitations for the reviewer/tester to know ?
| Code Review:QA / UAT - Previously
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2234 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2220 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2278 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2279 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2289 |
---|
|
- some unexpected behaviours (all fields search if all/none boxes are checked):
- selection resets when navigating between tabs does always reset in other parts of agreements
- may need some revisiting based on usergroup feedback about what default checked state is (all or none)
- checking/unchecking doesn't activate resetAll: this is unsurprising stripes behaviour
- issue with wrapping on narrow panes
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2315 |
---|
|
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2313 |
---|
|
- user removal happens on save and close, for a single removal rather than multiple removals
- duplicate users:
- cannot remove inactive users as users plugin doesn't support it
- styling varies slightly from mockups, as per discussion with Gill to coincide with new patterns
Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2312 |
---|
|
Bugfix Cycle
|
| Release Candidates - What has passed QA since last dev call?
- What has been closed since last dev call?
| Accepted Jira Legacy |
---|
server | System JiraJIRA |
---|
serverId | 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc |
---|
key | ERM-2306 |
---|
|
Closed: Nolana R2022.3Stories / BugsRTL / TasksPreviously Closed (No ERM Release) |
| AOB
| New IssuesAdded to sprint Not added to sprintOtherSIG discussion: - some changes expected to agreement search checkboxes that limit fields (ERM-2289)
- Some rework expected to fall out
- more to discuss on agreement lines next week, but for now:
- an labels in header on agreement lines on results MCL change depending on whether hideInternalKb is set (first column is not applicable if not used)
- does our search support searching refNo from eholdings without false positives? Owen to check, but we don't have any left anchoring support of substrings.
|