Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Topics that SIG members expressed interest in discussing
    • Ways to handle multi-volume orders
    • GOBI API integration show & tell
    • EDI ordering integration with other vendors
  • Contacted Ann Marie since early August to join one of Acquisitions SIG meetings to provide guidance and details for continuous discussion of Implementers Topic # 99 (still waiting to hear from A-MAnn Marie responded no development date has been set but happy to talk with the group if we would like, invited her to join our meeting for Implementers Topics discussion)
  • Jenn Colt and Natalya Pikulik of Cornell agreed to come to Acq SIG to demo ProQuest/Coutts EDI ordering integration they set up in FOLIO but they encountered some issue and waiting for it to be resolved before they come to demo in Acq SIG (see Slack communication thread originated on June 30 Corrie Hutchinson's EDI ordering instruction question for more details and follow up - most recent follow up with Natalya via the original Slack post was Sept. 6)
  • Aaron Neslin identified a list of Implementers Topics that were submitted by Duke with no one else attached their name to show interest yet - Topic # 33, 35, 36, 57, 60, 67, 69, 73.  My thoughts either we give a time period (a month, two months) with the topic numbers and ask SIG members to review and attach their name(s) if of interest or we can review each one briefly in one or two SIG meetings and add interested parties names to the topics accordingly.  Anything remains as Duke only can be determined by PO as to what to do with those topics.  Floated those with PO team but no response heard.  
  • Ideas for SIG meetings
    • As more institutions joining FOLIO, we see increasing numbers of Slack post by new implementers about issues or unusual behaviors they are experiencing and looking for help.  It's a bit challenging to answer some of the questions when the context or details are lacking or insufficient, so an idea .... perhaps we can add a 10-15 mins time slot in each meeting (if time permits) for people to bring questions they have to the group by doing screen share of what they are experiencing to help people see and understand the issue better to provide feedback or for PO and PO team to troubleshoot and resolve the issue(s)

...