...
| Rec Type | ID | Global/Local | Why unique? | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Item | Barcode | G | ||
| Item | HRID | |||
| Instance | Instance HRID | |||
| Holdings | Holdings HRID | |||
| Organization | Code | L | ||
| Organization | Name | L | ||
| Orders | PO Number | G | Erring on the side of caution here. Certain visibility into orders is necessary but deeper analysis of how much is shared is required | |
| Orders | PO Line | G | ||
| Invoices | Invoice # | L | ||
| Acquisition Unit | Name | G | Possible use case: central tenant acquires on behalf of other tenants. | |
| Fiscal Year | Name | L | ||
| Fiscal Year | Code | L | Presumptive. Need confirmation from consortia. | |
| Ledger | Code | L | ||
| Group | Code | L | ||
| Fund | Code | L |
...
| Question | Status | Conclusions | Comments | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Are any record types or unique identifiers missing in the above list, which will need to be visible or partially visible to some or all consortia members? |
| ||||||||||
| Are there any circumstances under which other order-specific information should be shared with the consortium? |
| ||||||||||
| Do IDs need to be natively unique or can they be augmented into uniqueness? | |||||||||||
| Why do we need uniqueness on a per record basis? |