Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...


Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Florian Gleixner 

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

5-10 minLiaison Updates
  • CC: Maccabee Levine
    • Two applications for the developer advocate
  • PC: Tod Olson 
    • PC meetins slot was used by the 3-council meeting
  • RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen 
    • No updates
  • Security Team: Craig McNally No updates, triaging issues.
    • No important updates - business as usual
  • Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt  
10 minTCR Board Review

All

  • Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyTCR-33
    - update from Jenn Colt? Tod Olson No meeting
  • Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyTCR-35
    - Jeremy Huff will take Meeting scheduled
  • Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyTCR-36
    - Jeremy Huff as well
  • Jira Legacy
    serverSystem Jira
    serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
    keyTCR-37
      - Jeremy Huff Ingolf Kuss
1 minUpcoming MeetingsAll
  • - Topic TBDeither Officially supported technologies or Poppy database upgrade scripts
    - TCR Process Improvements 
5-10 min

Technical Council Sub Groups Updates

All

Quick updates only.  If we can't find volunteers for groups, we'll need to add the topic to our backlog and address it during dedicated discussion sessions.

  • Configuration group - RFC has been created so close subgroup and move work to the RFC for configuration, will work on composing the groupNothing new, Olamide Kolawole will take a look and will comment .
  • Breaking changes - have volunteers Ankita, Zak, Jeremy. Will sort out their next steps
  • Translations - conversations in council
  • TCRs - group still meetingAnkita is not here today
  • Translations -
  • TCRs
    • Discussion how to get more people to participate in evaluations
  • Application formalization RF draft - Craig will work on
10 minRFCs

All


RFC Process Improvements:

  • We need another RFC to update the metadata retroactively to reflect the new or adjusted statuses. - Jenn Colt will do this, hasn't finished yet
    • Any volunteers?
    • Holding off on this for now - maybe someone will volunteer after the holidays.

Notes:

1-5 min

Postgres Messaging

All

The announcements were made before the holidays.  Has anyone received questions / comments on this?  

  • Ingolf Kuss this has not been addressed at the sysops group yet
  • Craig McNally will bump the threads to try to get more feedback

Notes:

no objections from sysops

no other feedback or objections

1 minDecision LogAll

Standing agenda item... is there anything in the decision log requiring attention?

5-10 min

Officially Supported Technologies

All

Standing agenda item to review/discuss any requested or required changes to officially supported technology lists

  • Check in on progress... does anything else require attention?
  • Next Important Milestone:  Review Ramsons (3rd party dependencies) and move from DRAFT → ACCEPTED by  
    • Maybe we should aim to start looking at this on so we have time for discussion/adjustments.
  • Versions for the components:
    • Resume discussion at an upcoming dedicated topic discussion?
NAZoom Chat

Jenn Colt  to  Everyone 11:10 AM
We can unassigned and reassign me later if that clarifies things.

You  to  Everyone 11:17 AM
I don't think you've screwed anything up Jenn.

Jenn Colt  to  Everyone 11:16 AM
I feel like I have already screwed up my first TCR haha

Tod Olson 11:17 AM
Ha!brb
I think we have the luxury of extra time, given the PC conversation.

Marc Johnson 11:18 AM
Not at all, you are experiencing the _quirks_ of how this stuff plays out in practice

Maccabee Levine  to  Everyone 11:31 AM
I'll bring this to the TCR Process Improvement subgroup, to see how we can improve getting explicit yes/no/don't care from PC

Marc Johnson  to  Everyone 11:32 AM
I thought Charlotte actively brought it to the PC for approval And acknowledged in that meeting that the TC process had already started

Tod Olson 11:32 AM
That was also my take.

Marc Johnson  to  Everyone 11:35 AM
I like Owen’s suggestion, especially as some modules might be more essential for inclusion than others

You  to  Everyone 11:36 AM
I will reach out to the RMS group letting them know the situation, good suggestion @Owen Stephens

Jenn Colt  to  Everyone 11:37 AM
It seems like Owen’s situation of much earlier PC acceptance is more the norm than the DCB/print timelines? At least in the past

Owen Stephens  to  Everyone 11:39 AM
To be fair that’s not the case

Jenn Colt  to  Everyone 11:37 AM
Does PC have a deadline like we do for releases?

Marc Johnson 11:37 AM
Not directly

Marc Johnson 11:43 AM
They are in the informal sequence that leads up to the flower release threshold

...