| * | TCR Improvements Review | | Background: - A subgroup has been working on improving the TCR process and would like the TC to review a slide deck which will be used to communicate the changes we've made to others in the project (other councils, POs, etc.)
- <add link to slide deck>
| Widget Connector |
|---|
| url | https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/138JUiebjq7NOXGVRWdl4I7ePdbnCdSRsYj2XxXWWABk/edit?usp=sharing |
|---|
|
Notes: - Still working on the styling of the slides, but the content is all there.
- Jeremy Huff walked us through the presentation
- Scope:
- Craig McNally If there's time today, let's try to agree on scope changes related to shared libraries and ui plugins.
- Maccabee Levine - slide 4 wording suggestion: "or
other development teams" - Comments on styling:
- Standard FOLIO slide theme
- Blue vs Orange headings?
- Maccabee Levine who is the intended audience?
- Product owners, other councils
- Maccabee Levine you may want to make it more clear what has changed while going through the process slides... provide some visual cue, e.g. *
- Maccabee Levine "PC approved submitter"
- In theory this is how it should work, in practice it has not happened this way.
- Craig McNally this will raise a lot of questions during the presentation.
- Jeremy Huff there's nothing wrong with presentation content raising questions
- Craig McNally in effect it means teams will need to engage the PC in order to kick off the process - since the process is technical in nature, it seems a little awkward.
- Marc Johnson We should be more specific on the "next steps" slide.
- There are already inconsistencies due to the PC's process being recently approved...
- Should we present this stuff as-is and then fix the process (preferred) OR
- Hold off on presenting this until we've resolved these things
- Call out that the PC has just introduced a new process and that what's being presented predates that.
- Marc Johnson this presentation is doing two things:
- Overview of the process - needed because some feedback was that the process wasn't clear
- Communicating what has changed
- Marc Johnson let's be clear about this during the presentation... Why we're doing both right now (overview + changes)
- Language in the scope statement about ui plugins and shared libraries was voted on and approved (7 for, 0 against). Craig McNally will update the official document and will raise awareness at the regular TC meeting. Approved text:
- For Poppy, ui-plugins are out of scope for evaluation. Starting with Quesnellia, they will be in scope.
- For Poppy, shared libraries are out of scope for evaluation. This decision will be revisited after the Poppy deadline has passed.
- Maccabee Levine Documentation Overview - a lot of links there...
- Marc Johnson Maybe keep the links, but in more of an "additional resources" slide, possibly in the appendix.
- To discuss on Wednesday:
- Doodle poll, timing, audience, etc.
- Record the presentation and share it.l
- Raise awareness of the scope statement changes approved today.
|