Versions Compared

Old Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Craig McNally

Saved on

compared with

New Version 6

changes.mady.by.user Tod Olson

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Jeremy Huff is next in the list, followed by Marc Johnson

5 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll
  • Stripe Architecture and auth token: Steve has proposed a solution, team thinks it straightforward depending on how we use specific headers. Document was shared in last week's TC meeting.
  • Formation of Exec TC group: no action yet
  • Section added to wiki on TC repo and acceptance criteria - 
3 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from previous meetings...

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod Olson?

Ready for review, see TC comments on CC designation of leading council for FOLIO Vision, Strategic Objectives and Initiatives for PC and TC usage

5-10 min

New Module Technical Evaluation

Previously: "External Code Submissions"

Craig McNally

Tod Olson 

Marc Johnson 

Quick update from the sub-group?

Quick update from the cross-council group for defining the end-to-end process?

5-10 minTCR Board ReviewAllAny new submissions?
5-10 minWOLFcon

Philip Robinson 

There’s a request for councils and SIGs to provide high-level WOLFCon topics and list them at FOLIO at WOLFcon  by December 1. This will be a topic at our next TC meeting. Please think about some session topics to prep for the discussion next week. Thanks!
20 min (Depending on attendance)

Technical Decision Making Process

Jakub Skoczen

This is a carry-over from last week.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

  • We had homework to review Jakub Skoczen's document and provide feedback/questions/comments.
    • Does the RFC proposal meet the purpose outlined here in this document?
    • Are there other proposals for a decision making process (maybe that borrow parts of the RFC process)?
  • Last time discussed:  "need some feedback, will come back next week".  Skipped last week due to low attendance.

20 min

(Depending on attendance)

Participation and Attendance ExpectationsAll
  • Low attendance/participation from some members is becoming concerning - it's probably worth aligning on expectations.  
  • Use of proxies?
  • How to handle low attendance
    • Cancel the meeting?
    • Still meet and make progress on things that don't require decisions to be made, e.g. review proposals and provide feedback, at least go through the usual updates
  • ...

Time permitting



  • Another meeting rules thing: should we have a formal policy/discussion about attendance, discussion, and decision making when attendance is low/less than half? 

...