Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
5 minsWelcome and updatePatty

Note taker wanted: Michelle S.

Any update on loans gaps? For reference current UX wireframe: ttps://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1Sr-G0HUR18uCTU0v5yYKIV92ZGXFLu9c

Update: Loan subgroup has been discussing timeframe and may be starting to look at the gap analysis on Thursday.

The gap documented was passed to Emma with a request for feedback/results when their review is complete.


Historical Migration data updateSharon

The historical data migration survey has been sent to relevant SIGS. Requested due date of the 14th (question). The "historical data migration" folder is here:

https://drive.google.com/drive/u/1/folders/1nCZjRK8riF6lO0_jpNUof2X8UjPi4g2y

20 mins

Vendor Gaps

Various

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MuC87SgE5XHYzu9ZtaRk0atQJhWIU2q7B73WUw8CQA4/edit#gid=1200473008

Are there questions to send back to the SIG after the analysis? Is anyone plan to load vendors into a test instance? Using a script or how?

Notes

Uschi has reviewed. Cornell review in progress.

Uschi was able to ask Ann-Marie some specific questions (to be continued during the next meeting on Monday Sept 10th)



15 minRequest GapsVarious

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1JhTWFaykVXslBIKioDTkfZWBCXJ2MRwc2RQYUxY5XNM/edit#gid=197030882

Cornell is still reviewing. We are giving people a couple of more weeks to review. We'll check back on this during a future meeting.

20 minsLooking aheadVarious

What are people working on loading into test environments? Should we keep track somewhere? Do we need Slack channels? Are people developing implementation project plans or just winging it? Can we get a bit of a plan for this group through the end of the year?

The group discussed a need for a place we can share datasets with each other. Patty will form a subcommittee which will create a requirements document for this need. Possible participants are Patty, Tod, Anne, Wayne. Patty will email them (cc Sharon) to begin putting this subgroup in place. The thought is this requirements document won't be ready for the entire data migration to review until mid Sept. Topics discussed around this new sub-group and the general need to have a shared spot for datasets:

  • possibility of interviewing SIG groups to flush out edge cases.
  • It would be useful if each implementer would record details about their attempts to load data. This could be under the data migration group in the wiki or maybe a spreadsheet.
  • Maybe add this requirement to the migration tools epic?


Action item

...