Page Comparison

• Chicago created instance, holding, item OLE mapping data which will go into a spreadsheet in the data mapping folder. Someone from Chicago will use some of this data to fill in the OLE column of the composite spreadsheet.
• We discussed the format of the composite spreadsheet (should we continue with it). We agreed to stick to this format specifically because it does provide utility (e.g. side-by-side view).
• We had a lengthy discussion about whether or not to add information like data types, repeatable, "nullable" to the composite spreadsheet. We didn't make a final decision about this but some of the comments around it were:
  • At this time our objective is to find data elements of possible concern and later should do a more detailed analysis where deficits are found.
  • How would we indicate data type on the spreadsheet: plain language sticking with conventional data types
  • Array has already begun to be noted in the spreadsheet with brackets[]
  • An example – we need a way to express we need space for more than one barcode
  • An example of "nullable" - Chicago has some patrons that do not have usernames
• Are these discussions redundant? – no ....no other groups are looking at this yet (other than metadata management)
• The migration group really serves as the reality check. We need to be able to raise red flags.
• We need to get this data out soon to be able to impact v1.
• Plan for sharing the composite spreadsheet:
  • Share it with both POs and SIG conveners
  • POs can provide context for the SIGs
  • We discussed possible ways to handoff this spreadsheet:
    • Quick meeting with someone from this group, POs and convenyers?
    • Possibly reach out to POs now to let them know we are working on this?
    • **Before the handoff we need to ask about the equivilency of some of the fields (are they equivilent or not)
  • Plan for the spreadsheet moving forward ...finish a portion during the week then discuss as a group:
    • Users (for next week)
    • Inventory
    • Circ.
    • Acq.
      • Charlotte will try to obtain the diagram created by Stacks/Dennis Bridges for Acq before we tackle this
• There is a MM SIG Working Groups inventory metadata elements spreadsheet. The data migration group can add notes in column i
• For access to google drive reach out to Anne. She prefers gmail associated email.
  
  

We spent a short amount of time talking about human readable IDs.

• We need to think about where they are needed.
• This topic is being actively discussed outside of this group
• Charlotte has been tasked to create a document around this subject (outsite of this group)