Page Comparison

Versions Compared

Key

This line was added.
This line was removed.
Formatting was changed.

...

Khalilah Gambrell Lynne Fors wioleta Jacek Gajkiewicz Joshua Barton Raegan Wiechert Jackie Magagnosc Laura E Daniels Julia Corrice Christine Schultz-Richert Natascha Owens Jamie Jesanis (Unlicensed) Natalie Sommerville Mary C Jessica Janecki Jeanette Kalchik

Item

Presenter

Notes

Announcements

All

Supporting the Michigan State community
Authority upgrades challenges (Morning Glory and Nolana)
- Jira Legacy
  server System Jira
  serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
  key PERF-456
  '
- Long-term solution feature (Poppy)
  Jira Legacy
  server System Jira
  serverId 01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
  key UXPROD-4082
- Will not be an issue for Orchid

Development updates

Khalilah

Sprint Board: https://issues.folio.org/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=40

Browse by call number type requirements review

Christine

Authority linking - Subjects - handling sub-division questions

Khalilah

Q1. Should 650s' subfield v, x, y, z be controlled?

Original authority record questions

Christine

When adding local terms to non-local authority records, which is the more common use case:
1. Edit original non-local record and add local terms
  1. Are these records differentiated from unmodified non-local records?
2. Copy original record, save as local record, add local terms
3. Copy original record, save as a local record, remove existing headings and replace with local heading
When a local authority record is created from existing non-local record, are the existing control number fields removed (such as the 010)?
Create upon import: Is it okay for now if new imported local authority records just have the 001 retained, as in current state?
1. This would mean, if we wanted to add the record to an authority file source, we'd need to add the prefix prior to import, or it would map to the "Not specified" authority file

...