WIP: Inventory. Refine result list (UXPROD-1634 and more) - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1kDumWwhNfP7Mq9hZ5q4O1cnbg_BY4ILgKbjBWOO4Xso/edit#slide=id.g9c99639b81_0_0
Spreadsheet to illustrate the enhanced Inventory Result list - see:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XLtdhnaHJz4Vb3G8FcHjso_LAUFdEzETo_50f8SYDrY/edit#gid=0
The listed examples in the spreadsheet is from Bugfest-Goldenrod - search:https://bugfest-goldenrod.folio.ebsco.com/inventory/view/50d09dd3-8586-4279-9883-24fbe6b6a407?qindex=title&query=vanity%20fair&sort=title
List of features:
UXPROD-1634 (index title/title)
UXPROD-2667 (sort on contributor, when more than one contributor is listed)
UXPROD-2668 (Adding instance HRID)
UXPROD-2669 (Adding resource type)
- summary of the past:
- displaying the title including initial articles sorting on index title
- limiting contributors to 3 at most (for those titles that include a lot of contributors)
- there were lots of good examples to support the adding instance HRID)
- based on 336 field (required in instances)
- related to content - not media or carrier
- does not distinguish print from electronic
- CW says it is not hard for the developers to add that column
- how to deal with the mapping?
- Christie suggests testing
- Folio takes the first 336?
- Do other 336s display?
- Ann K in chat ("I think it’s just the first one, but it needs to be tested
Sometimes they are out of order
It is supposed to be the “primary” one first, but that’s not always the case
Particularly in older records") - CW out of scope for the result list right now
- Affects filtering
- LW suggests commenting on the slides above
UXPROD-2670 (Adding format)
- not required
- useful - but would be useful
- LW concern is:
- might be blank
- will take up real estate
- the GMDs were formerly useful - but that is old standard
- CT: format type is highly ranked for UChicago
- harmonizing e and print inventory (CW) / new data element to be stored in the records
- mode issuance also relevant
- long term effort
- should not add columns if they are not really needed
- ref to Philip's solution using icons (deprecated according to CW)
- UX390 or 391?
- about granular data if it is NOT necessary to have that granularity
- Format type OR resource Type (is one preferred)
- Action item for this week: think about that above question: Format type OR resource Type (is one preferred)
- what should be used as a separator (space ; space as it is in 'contributor') +1 from LW
UXPROD-2671(Adding edition)
UXPROD-2703(Adding publication date)