Date
...
| Product Council Update | Former user (Deleted) | meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1umiCI56ZL8CvA6uPuQ_Skz04la699js-sT0ArW6IxCE/edit The Product Council was introduced to the new technical writer Marsha Borensztajn. Round 2 and Round 3 groups are being framed as MVP. Round 4 are implemented in Summer of 2021. These are "post-MVP" groups. Holly talked about ranking post-MVP features. The deadline for this will be June 1. New bilingual Product Owner, Lucy Liu, has begun and is working with the Shanghai Libraries. Laura asked whether the group would like to meet to discuss MVP features together. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subgroup & other updates? | Latest sprint review (slides) and video includes demos of data import, data export, resizable panes, normalized ISBN search, and filter by updated date Data Import: good demo this week, and good feedback from the subgroup. Subgroup is working on protecting MARC fields during replace/overlay actions. Developers are working on lots of bug fixes from field mappings, plus the UI for MARC Modifications. We're also finishing the work to bring the Instance Preceding/Succeeding fields under control of the default MARC-Instance map. Once that happens, those Instance fields will not be editable any more if Source = MARC Usability findings from Cornell: See link to report near bottom of this page | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bound-withs | How are these represented now? (demos from Raegan Wiechert Lisa McColl Felix Hemme Sharon Domier (5 Colleges) Natascha Owens Laura E Daniels) How do we plan (or hope) to migrate this data into FOLIO? What is the "ideal" model/behavior? Review these two features:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Feature ranking/gap analysis redux | for future meeting(s) features: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1IoGBR4uWXCTDeag5tlMf0fRD0BFDb8r84IOgS0ZUUUE/edit?usp=sharing ranking: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1g8pCNmg2DrGJzUAtQHXPas8M9WIDXijnY4q666teeDc/edit#gid=0 Action: How can we effectively address features and prioritization? How can we look collectively at what has not yet been developed and what is most important? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Future MM meetings (ongoing) | Add ideas here https://docs.google.com/document/d/1u1tvfVxn6i3fTImrWWCYHlh7RT5cf3_G7YgDuxKob4M/edit |
...