Date
...
| Item | Who | Notes | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product Council Update | The Product Council meeting centered around logistics for the Product Council business meeting. They talked about the Special Collections/Archives working group. This may result in a future FOLIO Forum. They are not yet ready to form a SIG. A convener is still needed for the Privacy SIG. | |||||||||
| Announcements | Laura Wright - UC Boulder will be MM-SIG co-convener MM-SIG "general get-together" at WOLFcon: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PfAfzrJNEIsFhg3G_W022VV0zMx58vbe7uw27gcacrM/edit - Charlotte suggested looking at the Instance/Holdings/Item UX with Kimmie. Lynn asked that we put our names next to the time we are available on the attached doc. There is some space that has opened up. If you will be at WOLFcon, please put your name on the document. WolfCon Draft agenda here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1jmjRAKBXJN2i1qPLOjdbeqi5xndTPyKzrDKuB8MeeBQ/edit#gid=958073271 No Zoom MM-SIG meeting next Thursday Charlotte asked that the document list all working groups and attendees. Laura asked that everyone please contribute package use case to this doc: | |||||||||
| Group & Subgroup Updates | Charlotte - Analytics and Bound-withs working group, the next meeting will be at WolfCon where they will present the consensus they have developed. | |||||||||
| Inventory UX follow-up | Patron information display discussion with Emma B. (Product Owner for Loan); also discussion about item notes - use for descriptive metadata; use for circulation. Also talk about having the Item record metadata element Number of Pieces separated in two fields (Number of Pieces + Description of Pieces) Per Charlotte:
___________ Emma - What is the specific concern about borrower information? Is it the number, the name, or both that is the problem? Jacquie - Expressed concern that any access to borrower information is not desirable, whether it is via barcode or name. Ann-Marie - Can this be controlled by permissions? Emma - If the barcode was visible, but patron info could not be accessed, would that be acceptable? Could the permissions be controlled in the user's app? Dennis - Wondered if unique id is a FOLIO id or an institution id. Showing an institution id fully could have negative implication. Lynn - In cases when checkouts are to "users" that are really workflow targets, such as the bindery, it is useful to have the barcode. Laura - Can we leave borrower out of Inventory entirely. Jessica - Good idea if there was a link a user with permissions could get easily Christie - Wondered if the item barcode could be the active/inactive link to circulation. | |||||||||
| Inventory<>MARCCat intersections & dataflows | Paper prepared for the WOLFcon session on Inventory and MARCcat on Tuesday 5/8 at 2:00 - 3:30 pm: "How MARC cataloging app and inventory fit together" https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b_DVh1CGaUQmFu6kMp4R44WUKMpMQ8fP5RVhaEv4eFk/edit Presentation of the paper and initial discussion. Planning of the WOLFcon session. | |||||||||
| Terminology for the Codex Search | Charlotte Whitt | Terminology for the Codex Search - the conducted usability test shown some confusion re. the terms: Codex, Local, Holdings Status. But this might be more a question about we're missing the build in help text - see Jira UISE-5 (
|