Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

 Ankita Sen is next, followed by Jakub Skoczen

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

5-10 minLiaison Updates
  • CC: Maccabee Levine
  • PC: Tod Olson 
    • Presentation from Discovery Integration Subgroup, see links from  of SysOps, survey and discussion of how FOLIO supports integration with discovery interfaces; see links from Results of the survey.
    • General dissatisfaction with current state of edge APIs, many (most?) are doing some or all integrations for live data through the Okapi APIs, as the edge APIs for discovery do not provide everything.
    • Some lower-level needs are not met at all, such as sorting multi-item display by volume.
    • Question about whether it is worth maintaining things like edge-rtac.
    • Unclear if there is a TC role in this.
  • RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen 
  • Security Team: Craig McNally 
    • No important updates - business as usual
  • Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt 
10-20 minTCR Board Review

All

  • TCR-37 (and TCR-35 and TCR-36)
  • TCR-33
    • Evaluation results ready to be presented.
  • Expect Serials app to come to PC and TC soon-ish. (Had gone to PC months ago, but no formal decision.)
1 minUpcoming MeetingsAll
  •  - Dedicated Topic Discussion - Communicating Breaking Changes?
  •  - Regular TC Meeting
  •  - (Tentative) Folio chairs meeting
  •  - Topic TBD
5-10 min

Technical Council Sub Groups Updates

All

Quick updates only.  If we can't find volunteers for groups, we'll need to add the topic to our backlog and address it during dedicated discussion sessions.

  • ...
10 minRFCs

All


RFC Process Improvements:

  • We need another RFC to update the metadata retroactively to reflect the new or adjusted statuses. - Jenn Colt
1 min

Postgres Messaging

All

The announcements were made before the holidays.  No objections. Probably need to ask testing people explicitly. 

See: DR-000038 - PostgreSQL Upgrade to 16

Notes:

1 minDecision LogAll

Standing agenda item... is there anything in the decision log requiring attention? 

  • ...
5-10 minRamsons OST pageAllOn  we reviewed the page, but weren't ready to move it to ACCEPTED yet as there were some unknowns related to Jest/RTL, Yarn, etc.  Craig McNally clarified those points with UI devs (Zak Burke) and I think we're now ready to give a final review and accept the page.
Time Permitting

Officially Supported Technologies (OST)

All

Standing agenda item to review/discuss any requested or required changes to officially supported technology lists

  • Check in on progress... does anything else require attention?
  • Next Important Milestone:  Review Ramsons (3rd party dependencies) and move from DRAFT → ACCEPTED by  
    • Maybe we should aim to start looking at this on so we have time for discussion/adjustments
  • Notes from  (this meeting):
    • On Wed, try to move Ramsons OST from DRAFT to ACCEPTED.
    • Two activities in preparation 
      • Review policies and reasoning on page with intent to vote on approval
      • Look at third-party dependencies.
    • NOTE: Java 17 support will run out, see conflicting dates but possibly Sep. 2024, need someone to dig into this.
  • Notes from this (5 Feb 2024?) meeting:
    • Maccabee Levine described updates to the process examples and walked through the example with Craig McNally who raised minor amendments
    • Marc Johnson suggested that there will only be 2 releases in 2024. Owen Stephens  and Craig McNally asked if anyone was aware of an official announcement on this
    • Craig McNally asked when there would be 4 active flower releases? Marc Johnson advised that there will be 4 releases when the previous 2 are in support, the current one is being released (and has not become generally available) and the next release has started development (after the feature freeze for the current release)
    • Marc Johnson shared the draft inclusion of policy decisions and reasoning for each type of technology in the Ramsons OST page
      • Craig McNally asked TC members to provide feedback on these changes

Notes:

  • Marc Johnson last week fixed an OST example about timing at feature development freeze.
  • TCR Process Improvement PR now refers to "most recent ACTIVE" release.
  • Ramsons will move to ACCEPTED later this month 2/16.  So should start looking at it.
    • This means we have to now (by 2/16) nail down the third-party dependencies.
    • Need versions on FE languages.  Need FE review of FE build tools, etc.  Craig McNally flagged Zak Burke Yogesh Kumar on various parts of the page.
    • BE: No plans to move to new Java, Groovy.  Julian Ladisch made several wiki page comments on versions.
    • For "unspecified versions" items, we should not be listing versions?  Have to either adopt new policy or not.
  • We'll discuss this Wednesday.
  • Marc Johnson brief recap:
    • Three policies and reasons behind them.
      • Unspecified Versions. 
        • Dev teams take responsibility for using the latest version they can sensibly use.  Needs to be supported. 
        • TC doesn't dictate version because the version doesn't have to be aligned across modules.  It may be de facto aligned anyway, i.e. Vertx may be constrained by version of RAML Modules.  Similarly FOLIO Spring Base.  Or Stripes will dictate the version of React.
      • One of Specified Versions. 
        • Expect module developers to comply with one of the specified versions, i.e. Java 17 or 21.  The platform will support both.  Individual modules just need to run on one or the other.
      • All of Specified Versions. 
        • Modules are supposed to work with all of the specified versions.  I.e. Postgres during Quesnelia, modules have to work with 14-17.  At any one time it would only be run with one, but has to be able to run with any of them.
    • Allocation of each software to a policy depends how much project-wide alignment we need about that tool.  There is a reasoning statement for each one explaining why.
  • Craig McNally helpful to link to products' support pages so dev teams can see which versions are supported easily.  Not a blocker on Ramsons moving to ACCEPTED.
    • Marc Johnson agree
    • Everyone read to be able to discuss on Wednesday.
    • Glossary will be moved out of Ramsons page.  Maybe to a separate page or the OST homepage.
NAZoom Chat

Florian Gleixner 11:11 AM
cannot unmute
yes

Jenn Colt to Everyone 11:13 AM
You have to acknowledge the recording notification before it will let you unmute
If you haven't

Florian Gleixner to Everyone 11:13 AM
yes
now it works

Jenn Colt to Everyone 11:13 AM
It’s very annoying!

Tod Olson to Everyone 11:19 AM
Interested, but no capacity at the moment.

Jenn Colt to Everyone 11:23 AM
I’m pretty sure we discussed and decided not to set a number when we updated this

Marc Johnson to Everyone 11:23 AM
Why do we want to ask publicly for feedback prior to the public review?

Jenn Colt 11:50 AM
It makes sense on that OST ‘homepage’

...