...
Question | Answer | Comment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Should failure in sending audit message block the create/update/delete operation? | Hey Kalibek Turgumbayev - what happens today when an update is made and the create/update date and time stamp is not updated? | The question is related to transactional outbox pattern implementation |
| 2 | What would be the period of retention for Audit records? | Dennis Bridges has this requirement come up for you with respect to Acq’s change tracker? | The storage options depend on this question:
|
| 3 | In what form should we show the changes to non-marc fields (e.g. staffSuppress, administrative Notes, etc.) in MARC instances? | Kalibek Turgumbayev - I am unsure I understand this question. Can you review this mockup of how to display updates made to a FOLIO instance record? | Instance with source FOLIO or MARC from inventory is a separate object than SRS record and should be tracked separately |
| 4 | If only the order of fields in a MARC record is changed, should it be logged? | Kalibek Turgumbayev - Good question - I need to ask users but unless it is a significant to implement, answer is Yes. Dennis Bridges has this requirement come up for you with respect to Acq’s change tracker? | |
| 5 | Do we have scenarios where the audit log is exported in batches for some period of dates? | It is possible that a library may want to do so but I do not think it is a requirement for Sunflower. Dennis Bridges has this requirement come up for you with respect to Acq’s change tracker? | If the solution uses Postgres with partitioning by entity key, such exports would cause significant performance issues. |
...