Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Risk

Description

Probability

Impact

Mitigation

1

Long period for audit records retention

The number of records could overwhelm the capability of the Postgres database both from a computational point of view and cost

High

High

Introduce separate storage for audit-events

2

Cascade Updates will create redundant copies in the audit log

The update to holdings causes updates to all related items. Some holdings may contain ~15000 records

High

Medium

Collapse or filter out events that only change parent entity

3

Some flows could update inventory entities without using the Domain-events mechanism

With different capabilities of the system including UI, data import, bulk edit, etc some of the flows might skip sending Domain events and/or edit entities directly

Low

Medium

List those cases and add domain events to flows that has no this capability

4

Linked data

The flow and integration with inventory are not clear for the BIBFRAME format

Low

Low

Adjust BIBFRAME flow to follow the proposed solution for other inventory entities

Questions

  1. [Arch] Acquisition log solution uses a Transactional Outbox pattern to ensure atomicity of
    business and audit operation. This is done because this log contains data related to financial
    operations. Do we need to use the Transactional Outbox pattern for the Inventory case?

    • We need an outbox pattern if we REALLY need to track those changes

  2. [Arch] Do we use mod-audit or just source module? (acquisition log uses mod-audit module but with specific tables)

    • Use mod-audit with audit separate table for inventory events

    • Retention period: is not yet addressed

  3. [Product] There is a library for the comparison of Java objects that outputs the difference between two objects in the following form:

...