Versions Compared
Version | Old Version 2 | New Version 3 |
---|---|---|
Changes made by | ||
Saved on |
Key
- This line was added.
- This line was removed.
- Formatting was changed.
Note | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
We run full regression test during Q1 2020 Bug Fest. 91% of the test cases has been marked as PASSED. |
Image Removed
Bug Fest notes:
Please see table below that compares results for the pas 3 Bug Fest Cycles.
Image Added
- We had fewer testers to participate in this Bug Fest: 36 vs 39 vs 43
- Testing community has been a great help again! 31 testers from different institutions helped us to complete this test cycle.
- It was much better executed test cycle compare to Q3.2:
- Not executed 1 vs 33
- Blocked 4 vs 12
- Retest 8 vs 40
- Failed 66 vs 50
- Passed 610 vs 464
- Total 689 vs 599
- There is a positive trend in terms of balancing test case between Testing Community Members and Folio Staff:
- Community members executed more test cases in Q4 vs Q3.2: 545 vs 395
- Folio staff executed less test cases in Q4 vs Q3.2: 137 vs 180
- We had several environment issues related to data migration and configuration of the reference data.
- Product Owners picked up more test cases this time. A lot of test cases were added the last minute and cannot be delegated to community testers.
- It was the first time we were using large inventory dataset (almost 9M items). It allowed us to uncover a lot of issues that didn't manifest themselves with a smaller dataset.
- Most of schema updates issues were relatively easy to resolve. However, we had to delay Bug Fest start by 1 day.
- Overall, system performance was good. However it suffered due to the fact that some table indexes were missing during data migration.
Individual Participation:
Image Removed
Image Added
Participation by Institution:
![](https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/download/thumbnails/3442064/image2020-1-6_8-55-56.png?version=1&modificationDate=1586218465000&cacheVersion=1&api=v2&width=200)
Image Added
Highlights of the results:
- 70 117 defects has been logged.
- 13 19 defects has been closed as "duplicate", "cannot reproduce", or "won't do". It is much lower percentage about the same compare to previous BugFest Q3.2.
- Defects were created by 24 different participants.
- Holly Mistlebauer is the Bug Fest Champion with 18 submitted defects.
- Testers logged the most number for defects against ui-users (25).
- ui-inventory and mod-inventory-storage did much better this time. Only 4 defects has been filed.
- ui-orders (5), ui-finance (6), and ui-organizations (5) received the highest defect count.
- All 7
- Testers didn't create defects in Jira this time. This task was assigned to product owners. Therefore we cannot provide number of defects per tester report
- ui-users module receive the highest number of defects(31) again.
- Notably, mod-circulation (14), ui-inventory(18), ui-requests(10) did not as good as the other modules.
- All 21 P1 defects were addressed before release.
- There were 21 46 out of 54 P2 defects . 18 of them has been fixed. The rest has been assigned to the future releases.
- Link to the live JIRA dashboard is here.
- Q4 release was delayed due to time needed to fix defects that were found during Bug Fest Q4.
Image Removed
![](https://folio-org.atlassian.net/wiki/download/thumbnails/3442064/Bug%20Fest%20Q4%202019%20-%20FOLIO%20Issue%20Tracker%202020-01-03%2015-32-28.png?version=1&modificationDate=1586218465000&cacheVersion=1&api=v2&width=800)
- were fixed before release or included into Hot Fixes.
- Q1 release was delivered as planned on time.
Image Added
Image Added