Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user Paula Sullenger

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Paula Sullenger

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

Attendees

Paula Sullenger

Jean Pajerek

Kelly Drake

Jackie Magagnosc

Molly Driscoll

Debra Howell

Tracy L Patton

Monica Arnold

Marie Widigson

@Dwayne Swigert

Janice Pfaff

Brooks Travis

Martina Tumulla

Karen Newbery

@Joanna Cerro

Lisa Sjögren (EBSCO)

Peter Murray

@urszula Knepper

Ian Walls

egerman

Tod Olson


Goals

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes




Finish ranking definitions

Rankings definitions


R1 - Urgent

Cannot implement without this feature; Cannot complete critical functions without this feature


R2 - HighLibrary operations are severely curtailed; Significantly lowers productivity; Cannot fulfill obligations to patrons or partners


R3 - MediumCan perform normal operations but productivity is noticeably lower; Workaround is insufficient and suitable only for short-term use


R4 - LowHas minimal impact on productivity; feature commonly available in other ILS/LSPs; nice to have; Workaround is viable although long-term solution is still needed (or workaround lacks functionality)


R5 - Not needed



Topics of interestDebra Howell

Based on UXPROD-1752, optimistic locking, where it was ranked but there was a workaround, which didn't actually work. 

Debra found 64 workarounds in JIRA - some are go-live (20) and  showstoppers (6) for Cornell that aren't being worked on. She was told to make comments in JIRA

Do other institutions want to do the same search - look for your features that have workarounds that aren't actually workarounds?

Search filter:

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
jqlQueryfilter=12622
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc


Topics for next week
Emma Boettcher, PO for item status - trying to work out a plan for if the custom item status feature doesn’t make it into the development plan before implementers go live with FOLIO.   Would like to discuss what item statuses should be prioritized for development.

Action items

  •