Versions Compared

Old Version 4

changes.mady.by.user Ingolf Kuss

Saved on

compared with

New Version 5

changes.mady.by.user Ingolf Kuss

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll
Ingolf Kuss is next, followed by Maccabee Levine

Reminder:  Please copy/paste the Zoom chat into the notes.  If you miss it, this is saved along with the meeting recording, but having it here has benefits.

WolfCon planning: TC meeting in person on Friday.

5-10 minLiaison Updates

Maccabee Levine

Tod Olson

Jakub Skoczen

Craig McNally

Jenn Colt 

  • CC: Maccabee Levine
    • no CC meeting last week. Mostly an updated to institutions who are members. Hard to coordinate many groups.
  • PC: Tod Olson
    •  Things that could be better about FOLIO survey . PC are picking up some of the issues. PC & TC don't control resources. How do we organise funding ? Probably the CC is the way to go there. Focus on forward-looking features. "Market-fit".
    • Included discussion of how development is or can be funded.
    • Interest in balance of "traditional" functionality vs forward-looking features in the context of market fit.
  • RMS Group: Jakub Skoczen . No upgrade.
  • Security Team: Craig McNally . "Rejuvenate" the group. Will bring it to the TC for the final approval of new members.
  • Tri-council Application Formalization: Jenn Colt . Met last week. Reorganised themselves. Spreadsheet about .... Waiting for repsonse of Sys Ops. Want to return to original tasks. Will return to weekly schedule. It will be a good feature to get the RFC approved, people are waiting for confirmation from the technical side.
1 minUpcoming MeetingsAll
  •   - Dedicated Discussion - Cancel due to holidays
  •   - Regular TC Meeting
  •   - Dedicated Discussion - Topic TBD
  •   - Regular TC Meeting - New Co-Chair
  •   - Dedicated Discussion - Topic TBD
1 minTCR Board ReviewAll

TCR-41 mod-reading-room. No news about PC approval. Kristin on holiday.

No volunteers. Proposal: round-robin for TCR evaluators.

Shall we wait until PC approval until we begin our review ?

Is there a threshold for a flower release ? Would be Ramsons.

→ Next regular meeting: Establish a rotation for TCRs.

5 min

Technical Council Sub-Groups Updates

All

Release Stakeholders Group. Jenn and Maccabee met.

Static Code Analysis. Will meet tomorrow. Jeremy, Ingolf, Ankita.

Developer Documentation:

1 minRFCs

All

No new RFCs.

Application Formalisation RFC. Public Review phase is finished. Vince and Craig give an overview.

Wording was a bit misleading. Some minor adjustments.

Jeremy: Essentially we are voting on the introduction of standardised, descriptive metadata. It does not introduce new functionalities.

Marc: It does not even go as far as that. It does not introduce any application descriptors.

Craig: Application descriptors already do exist. Need to split them up into reasonable size chunks.

Jeremy: Will the TC have a chance to address these things (the next steps; the Eureka stuff) in an RFC ?

Craig: Remember that we already approved the abstracts of additinal RFCs (following application formalisation). The Eureka stuff is probably too large to be addressed in the RFC context.

Marc: Not yet addressed is the Eureka piece and the Tri-Council stuff (about application formalisation).

Craig: We could have just one retrospective for all three. We should probably re-consider the frequency of these things coming along ? It's probably a one-off, an exception.

Jeremy: The TC is eager to engage. Decision Records are another mechanism. Let's bring the focus back to this specific RFC.  Kong and Keycloak are out-of-scope for this RFC.

1 minAction Items

Jeremy Huff


10-15 minApplication Formalization RFCCraig McNally

We will begin the final review of the Application Formalization RFC: https://github.com/folio-org/rfcs/pull/34

1 minDecision LogAll

Nothing new

Time Permitting

Officially Supported Technologies (OST)

All
NAZoom Chat


...