Date
...
Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals |
---|---|---|---|---|
5 min | Housekeeping | Andrea Loigman |
| |
15min | Notices | Multiple items single notice/increments for sending | Better understand the expectations and interdependencies around requirements of these tightly linked issues. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13Xnb7j-xt0CZrgD9zRuH3OBX_bxR8FNl94F52Lom9gM/edit#gid=0 | |
10 min | Creation of MVP | Holly Mistlebauer | At the D.C. meeting the Product Council charged the Capacity Planning Team to identify a Market-Viable Product (MVP) |
|
30 min | Fees/Fines | Holly Mistlebauer | Re-ranking fee/fine features | Review for Fee/Fine UXPROD features for possible re-ranking (Please open the spreadsheet at https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/17muqftBy3M1BRA4bedbSHeUI1v8oG4KCMES1uf3QG1k/edit?usp=sharing to work along with Holly) |
...
Functional Area | Product Owner | Planned Release (if known) | Decision Reached | Comments |
---|---|---|---|---|
e.g. loans, fees/fines | Name | e.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019 | ||
Notes
RA SIG 7-11-19
Darcy discussed the criteria for having multiple items on a single notice:
...
Fine Fees: Holly asks us to look at the Fine Fee Ranking spreadsheet (link above) and note the ones highlighted in yellow. Is the ranking correct? If not, change and update in JIRA. Ranking scale: highest number is the most important. Some discussion about the behavior of Claims Returned: fines should be suspended when that a CLMR status is applied, but the fine is only calculated after the item is returned/discharged. Need to have a discussion on whether/how to charge or not charge fine.