Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Date

...

TimeItemWhoDescriptionGoals
5 minHousekeepingEmma Boettcher
  • Notetaker
  • Are we meeting 6/20

Ranking review introHolly MistlebauerHolly gives overview of ranking review process
30+ minRequests rankingsReview relative rankings for Requests from gap analysis
  • Review the requests UXPROD rankings according to Holly's proposed process: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1PxQ-qPJeCLkUEaOhZL4bQHUA3vT80e1tivfZsjCr1WY/edit
  • Goal is to:
    • Make sure ppl understand the meaning of the features (use cases will be really valuable here)
    • Discuss any surprises ("why was this ranked so high/low")?
    • Really question whether each feature is going to be a blocker for go-live with the goal or reducing go-live rankings for institutions
    • Split features if one piece seems higher priority than another
    • SIG members should be empowered to update their rankings on the fly during the discussion (spreadsheet will be provided)
15minAnonymizationManual anonymization of loans & fines/feesDecide: is a setting needed to prevent (or allow) manual anonymization of loans with fines/fees

10minCheck outCheck out messages orderTradeoff at checkout: suboptimal message order (non-circulating override displays at the end) with better performance, OR optimal message order with slower performance?

...

Functional Area

Product Owner

Planned Release (if known)

Decision Reached

Comments

e.g. loans, fees/finesNamee.g. Q4 2018, Q1 2019


Notes