Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Meeting time: 8:30 AM (EST) / 1:30 PM (BST) / 2:30 PM (CEST)

...

Housekeeping and major community updates

Agenda items

Minutes

...

  • Looking at the SLUB workflow chart
  • OS: Is this workflow any different in other institutions?
    • PMC: much more simpler, question on how much to pay based on the mumber of authors; just one fund with requirement on report but not the requirement to track all this information
    • Group: agreement to SLUB's workflow chart
  • AO: looking at a status between open and closed, there are a lot of steps
  • OS: "In progess" should include the answer of "who is next in charge to do something", external/internal, right?
    • Group: yes, agreement
  • Homework document
  • AO: need to encumber money for BPC first of all, planned but not approved
    • will be followed up on Acq discussion
  • Discussion about workflow/status field
  • BM: Status fields often represent a series of steps with a given order, but if we have multiple "tasks" that can be done in parallel, we do not have a particular order + we can not infer from one status that all stepas before have been done
  • OS: Needs more thinking and discussion with Gill, maybe thinking more of "tasks" that can be done in parallel
  • Discussed examples of institutional hierarchies

Attendees

Present

Name

Home Organization

x

Owen Stephens

K-Int


Ian IbbotsonK-Int
xGill OsguthorpeK-Int

Björn MuschallUL Leipzig
xChristina PrellUL Regensburg

Caroline ZieglerUL LMU Munich

Volker SchallehnUL LMU Munich
xVanessa GabrielUL LMU Munich

Eloisa Deola SchennerleinSLUB Dresden

Lisa SchäferZBW

Martin BauschmannUL Leipzig
xPeter SbrzesnyVZG Göttingen

Mona OrloffZBW
xAstrid OrthSUB Göttingen

Cornelia Lang

UL Regensburg

(proxy Christina Prell)

xPeter McCrackenCornell University

EthanK-Int Dev

Sam HepburnK-Int Dev

Frank Manista

JISC UK


Simone GrunerSLUB Dresden

Michael WolgemuthSLUB Dresden

...