Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Table of Contents

Overview

One outcome of a recent investigation into misleading permission set configuration (

Jira Legacy
serverSystem Jira
serverId01505d01-b853-3c2e-90f1-ee9b165564fc
keyFOLIO-2565
) is the proposal of new guidelines for permission sets.  This document serves as a place to capture that proposal and elicit feedback from others and facilitate discussion. 

Naming Conventions

  1. Name the permission sets appropriately, e.g. avoid inclusion of POST/PUT/DELETE permissions in "*.view" permission sets.
    • Good: 

      Code Block
      languagejs
      {
        "permissionName": "ui-erm-usage.view-create-edit",
        "displayName": "eUsage: Can view, create and edit usage data providers and COUNTER reports",
        "id": "ade748af-66b5-4584-a319-3cac20899241",
        "description": "Can view, create and edit usage data providers and COUNTER reports",
        "tags": [],
        "subPermissions": [
          "module.erm-usage.enabled",
          "usagedataproviders.collection.get",
          "usagedataproviders.item.get",
          "usagedataproviders.item.post",
          "usagedataproviders.item.put",
          "counterreports.collection.get",
          "counterreports.item.get",
          "counterreports.item.post",
          "counterreports.item.put",
          "aggregatorsettings.collection.get",
          "aggregatorsettings.item.get"
        ],
        "childOf": [],
        "grantedTo": [
          "fba0106d-e2ad-494e-8958-ce5b447ab2aa"
        ],
        "mutable": false,
        "visible": true,
        "dummy": false
      }


    • Bad: 

      Code Block
      languagejs
      {
        "permissionName": "ui-receiving.basic.view",
        "displayName": "Receiving: Basic view",
        "id": "5542bb26-9eff-4699-a7c5-6e6a049979d7",
        "tags": [],
        "subPermissions": [
          "module.receiving.enabled",
          "orders.item.get",
          "orders.pieces.item.post",
          "orders.pieces.item.put",
          "orders.po-lines.collection.get",
          "orders.titles.collection.get",
          "orders.titles.item.get",
          "ui-receiving.third-party-services"
        ],
        "childOf": [
          "ui-receiving.view"
        ],
        "grantedTo": [],
        "mutable": false,
        "visible": false,
        "dummy": false
      }


  2. Permission sets for modulePermissions should use the "modperms" prefix.  These also should not be visible as they aren't intended to be assigned to users.
    • Example: 

      Code Block
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.loans.anonymize",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.override-renewal-by-barcode.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.renew-by-barcode.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.requests.item.move.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.renew-by-id.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.requests.item.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.override-check-out-by-barcode.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.requests.item.put",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.requests.instances.item.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.circulation.check-out-by-barcode.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.orders.item.post",
        "permissionName": "modperms.orders.item.put",


  3. TBD

Backend Modules

  • Avoid inclusion of other modules permissions in your permission sets.  For example, mod-foo's permission set foo.all shouldn't include mod-bar's bar.item.get permission.  Here it's the module that needs the permission, not the user.
    • Do:  include the other module's permission(s) in your modulePermissions (or non-visible modulePermission sets - see above)
    • Don't:  include other modules permissions in your visible permission sets that will be assigned to users.

UI Modules

  • Define separate permission sets for settings if other other module permissions are needed (e.g. configuration.entries.collection.get). 
    • Example: "ui-users.settings.customfields.edit" probably needs configuration.entries.collection.get, but "ui-users.view" probably doesn't.  If needed, additional permission sets should be created with appropriate names.

Other Considerations

  • Sensitive information should NEVER be stored in mod-configuration. SMTP credentials, RMAPI credentials, etc. should be stored behind their own endpoints which are protected with distinct permissions.
  • We might want to take a look at ways to make the permissions of this module more granular, perhaps something could be done using desiredPermissions / X-Okapi-Permissions? Though I'm not sure this is really doable or even worth it. I think I'm in favor of just moving away from mod-configuration all together (see below)
  • We should consider moving away from using mod-configuration in general. The cross-app nature of this module makes it difficult to deal with other things like sample/reference data... what if you want some reference data loaded into mod-configuration, but not all of it?
  • TBD