Details
Reporter
Darcy BranchiniDarcy BranchiniPO Rank
8PO Ranking Note
Not ranked by very many.Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)
R2Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)
R4Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019)
R4Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020)
R4Rank: hbz (TBD)
R4Rank: Mainz (Full TBD)
R2Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021)
R4Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020)
R5Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020)
R2Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)
R4Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020)
R4TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: CasesTestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Details
Details
Reporter
Darcy Branchini
Darcy BranchiniPO Rank
8
PO Ranking Note
Not ranked by very many.
Rank: 5Colleges (Full Jul 2021)
R2
Rank: Cornell (Full Sum 2021)
R4
Rank: Chalmers (Impl Aut 2019)
R4
Rank: GBV (MVP Sum 2020)
R4
Rank: hbz (TBD)
R4
Rank: Mainz (Full TBD)
R2
Rank: TAMU (MVP Jan 2021)
R4
Rank: Chicago (MVP Sum 2020)
R5
Rank: MO State (MVP June 2020)
R2
Rank: U of AL (MVP Oct 2020)
R4
Rank: Lehigh (MVP Summer 2020)
R4
TestRail: Cases
Open TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs
Open TestRail: Runs
Created June 13, 2019 at 7:01 PM
Updated August 9, 2024 at 6:05 PM
Use cases:
Query users for specific criteria, such as near expiration date (or graduation date) and owe the library more than $100, in order to send these users an ad-hoc notice.
Query users once a quarter for outstanding fee/fines and send reminder notices with a comprehensive list of all fee/fines on a single notice per patron.
From Duke: It may be the case that we want to do a second notice for a hold pickup ad-hoc, rather than systematically. I can see branches that might want both - our bigger branches wanting second notices to go automatically to save overhead, whereas smaller branches want to do it for particular patrons but not bother others.