Settings: Inconsistent behavior when entering blank Patron Group

Description

Patron Group is a required field. The UNAM development team modeled CRUD Fee/Fine Owner after Patron Group, and while testing Fee/Fine Owner I realized it has similar problems to Patron Groups.

1. The first time I tried to enter a blank Patron Group, I got an unfriendly system error message rather than a user friendly one (see attached ScreenPrint1.jpg).

2. I then entered the Description and left the Patron Group blank. I did not get an error message this time. The entry was saved with a blank. (See attached ScreenPrint2.jpg).

3. I then deleted the blank entries and tried entering a blank Patron Group again (#1 above). This time it went through without an error message. (See attached ScreenPrint3.jpg).

4. I then tried #2 above again. This time I received the error message show in attached Screenprint4.jpg.

The results are very inconsistent. For this test I used Chrome at http://folio-snapshot-stable.aws.indexdata.com/settings/users on March 14, 2018.

CSP Request Details

None

CSP Rejection Details

None

Potential Workaround

None

Attachments

4
  • 14 Mar 2018, 04:54 PM
  • 14 Mar 2018, 04:54 PM
  • 14 Mar 2018, 04:54 PM
  • 14 Mar 2018, 04:54 PM

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

md331 March 28, 2018 at 2:26 PM

Closing as Duplicate of STCOM-228 scenario 17.

That issue is In Review currently and these this set of issues was fixed as part of the PRs. It's live on folio-testing.

Cate Boerema March 16, 2018 at 11:06 AM

, I added some scenarios to STCOM-228 to cover validation for required fields. I will assign this to you for now. You can close it, if you think it is redundant at this point, or just leave it open so we can retest when STCOM-228 is complete. Thanks

Cate Boerema March 15, 2018 at 12:10 PM

, tagging you here as a heads up, since you are working stcom-228 and this might be fixed by that?

Cate Boerema March 15, 2018 at 9:45 AM

, I am not sure how much we should continue to fix issues with patron group crud given we are planning STCOM-228 (Make EditableList Component Behave Like Patron Group CRUD). Thoughts?

Duplicate

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Priority

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs
Created March 14, 2018 at 4:49 PM
Updated April 6, 2018 at 12:40 PM
Resolved March 28, 2018 at 2:26 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs

Flag notifications