Atlassian uses cookies to improve your browsing experience, perform analytics and research, and conduct advertising. Accept all cookies to indicate that you agree to our use of cookies on your device. Atlassian cookies and tracking notice, (opens new window)
Lost item fee policy: Words "late" and "Set cost" missing on entry of new policy
Description
This is a fix to the Lost Item Fee Policy (UIU-1156) that needs to be fixed in Q4 2019.
When entering a new Lost Item Fee Policy, the word "late" is missing after the "Select interval" drop-down for "No fees/fines shall be refunded if a lost item is returned more than" (the last setting on the list). See the attached file for details. The word "late" is showing up properly when you view the Lost Item Fee Policy.
Update: At the Resource Access SIG meeting on November 18, 2019 we were asked to add the words "Set cost" to make the distinction between the "Actual cost" and "Set Cost" clearer. See the attached file for details.
Hi @Arturo Rendón Cruz! At the Resource Access SIG meeting today, the attendees asked me to change the "New list item fee policy page" to add a label that distinguishes "Set cost" from "Actual cost" clearer. I have updated the attached mock-up to show how this should be done. This is a snippet from the mock-up:
This is a fix to the Lost Item Fee Policy (UIU-1156) that needs to be fixed in Q4 2019.
When entering a new Lost Item Fee Policy, the word "late" is missing after the "Select interval" drop-down for "No fees/fines shall be refunded if a lost item is returned more than" (the last setting on the list).
See the attached file for details. The word "late" is showing up properly when you view the Lost Item Fee Policy.
Update: At the Resource Access SIG meeting on November 18, 2019 we were asked to add the words "Set cost" to make the distinction between the "Actual cost" and "Set Cost" clearer. See the attached file for details.