I think we need to change how the following fields are populated: personalNameTitle, sftpersonalNameTitle, saftpersonalNameTitle

1. We should only populate when $t is present in the 1XX, 4XX, 5XX fields. 

2. When $t is not present then do not populate. 

Here is an example with Lotus bugfest

Issue 1

1. See record uploaded 

1. This is a Personal Name heading with a title (also known as  MARC field 100 with $t)

2. Expected and actual outcome: The record uploaded populates personalNameTitle and sftpersonalNameTitle as I expect https://folio-snapshot.dev.folio.org/data-import/log/583c7076-73b6-4c96-9ecf-19c94644f82d/14b8cca1-bc84-4d00-a783-c710cf4a1409 

•  

  • Expected outcome: Do not populate personalName and only populate sftPersonalName and saftPersonalName IF $t is not present 

1. Another observation:  Notice that personalName and sftPersonalName has different values from personalNameTitle and sftPersonalNameTitle... Why? 

Issue 2

1. See record uploaded 

1. This is a Personal heading without a title (also known as  MARC field 100 without $t)

2. Actual outcome: The record uploaded populates personalName, personalNameTitle, sftpersonalName, sftpersonalNameTitle - https://folio-snapshot.dev.folio.org/data-import/log/d856f035-4c6c-468f-9b23-e4e52f8f3b14/8de870bb-258f-43c5-ba1f-133fdf8e9029 

3. Expected outcome: Populate personaName, sftpersonalName, saftpersonalName when $t is not present. Do not populate personalNameTitle, sftpersonalNameTitle, and saftpersonalNameTitle