Title should be required for unconnected preceding / succeeding titles

Description

In order to ensure that there is a way to refer to unconnected preceding and succeeding titles, we should make the title required.

  1. Scenario

    • Given an instance for Scientific American

    • When a unconnected preceding title is added without a title

    • Then it should be rejected and an error message provided explaining why

  1. Scenario

    • Given an instance for Scientific American

    • When a unconnected preceding title is added with title Unscientific American

    • Then the unconnected preceding title for Unscientific American should be created

  1. Scenario

    • Given an instance for Scientific American

    • When a unconnected succeeding title is added without a title

    • Then it should be rejected and an error message provided explaining why

  1. Scenario

    • Given an instance for Scientific American

    • When a unconnected succeeding title is added with title More Scientific American

    • Then the unconnected succeeding title for More Scientific American should be created

CSP Request Details

None

CSP Rejection Details

None

Potential Workaround

None

Checklist

hide

TestRail: Results

Activity

Show:

Bohdan Suprun April 30, 2020 at 1:16 PM

Merged to master.

Cate Boerema April 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM

I am changing this to a bug because it is a failed requirement from the original story.

Cate Boerema April 1, 2020 at 9:33 AM

Charlotte confirmed we want this required.

Cate Boerema March 31, 2020 at 8:10 AM

Just putting this in Draft for now, as is going to double check with the MM SIG whether this needs to be required.

Done

Details

Assignee

Reporter

Labels

Priority

Story Points

Sprint

Development Team

Prokopovych

Fix versions

TestRail: Cases

Open TestRail: Cases

TestRail: Runs

Open TestRail: Runs

Created March 23, 2020 at 4:02 PM
Updated June 11, 2020 at 11:58 AM
Resolved April 30, 2020 at 1:16 PM
TestRail: Cases
TestRail: Runs