Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

2021-11-17 Meeting notes

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Next »

Date

Attendees

Discussion items

TimeItemWhoNotes
1 minScribeAll

Dennis Benndorf is next in the list, followed by Zak Burke 

5-10 min

Review outstanding action itemsAll


3 minCouncil Goals/ObjectivesAll

Follow-up from previous meetings...

Previous notes:

From Mike Gorrell:

I have created a clean copy of what the Community Council created to identify which FOLIO Goals/Objectives were under the purview of the CC. We also took a stab at what thought would be handled by PC or TC. Please feel free to give us feedback/etc. https://docs.google.com/document/d/17jVxW2XEK2bRSpXG9_FvdVtgqDfCTeKKM5h49IIhmRw/edit#heading=h.m2gdb67ibe1x. and use for your planning purposes.

Update from Tod Olson?

Can we set a deadline for having something ready for the TC to review and discuss?

3 minUpgrade/Migration Script Performance

Raman Auramau

Quick update from Raman Auramau?

Action Items with deadlines?

15-20 min

New Module Technical Evaluation

Previously: "External Code Submissions"

Craig McNally

Zak Burke 

15-20 min

Technical Decision Making Process

Jakub Skoczen

This is a carry-over from last week.

  • The tech leads group not being a decision making body
  • Whether it's realistic and/or desirable for the TC to make every technical decision
    • There was some overlap here with the external code submission topic

Additional Context: 

For Today:

  • We had homework to review Jakub Skoczen's document and provide feedback/questions/comments.
    • Does the RFC proposal meet the purpose outlined here in this document?
    • Are there other proposals for a decision making process (maybe that borrow parts of the RFC process)?
  • From last week:  "need some feedback, will come back next week"

Time permitting

TC charter review

All

Action items

  • Craig McNally to create a place on the wiki where we can capture meeting rules/policies, how meetings are run, how agendas are formed, etc. - by 11/17
  • Tod Olson , Jeremy Huff , Anton Emelianov (Deactivated) to connect on the cross-council group for defining the larger process for new module acceptance - no clear deadline defined, but effectively should happen by 11/17
  • Jakub Skoczen and Stripes Architecture to devise a transition plan for auth token expiration, adoption of refresh tokens, etc.  - no clear deadline defined, but soon given that some of this is tentatively scheduled for Lotus
  • Craig McNally , Zak Burke , Jakub Skoczen , Raman Auramau to discuss the formation of an executive TC group for forming meeting agendas and how it might work - no clear deadline defined
  • Tod Olson to define a deadline for having a set of Goals/Objectives ready for the TC to review and discuss - by 11/17


  • No labels