Date
Zoom
https://zoom.us/j/337279319 (pw: folio-lsp)
Attendees
Discussion Items
| Time | Item | Who | Description | Goals/Info/notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2min | Administrivia | Note taker: Ian Ibbotson (Use this one) | ||
| Continue to gather requirements and discussion | ||||
Meeting Notes
Attendees : Andy Horbal, Sarah Seestone, Jana Freytag, Dwayne Swigert, Laszlo Jakusovsky, David Bottoff, Andrea Loigman, Kimie Matsudo Kester,
Scope:
- DB: Initial scope vs Ultimate Scope - Ultimate scope is full CDL/ILL but initially scope is internal.
- AL : Stages - start with CDL from our own offsite collections for our own people
- Then grow out into consortial ILL
- SS: Very much internal - Stanford Collections, internally - maybe eventually more broadly
- DB: Do / Don't we need to draw a distinction between ILL and internal
- Chicago - CDL for course reserves
- AH: Cornell - What CDL is may depend upon what is delivered
- Knowing what we are building towards may help institutions plan / decide
- AL: Draw a distinction between whole collections being sequestered vis item-by-item level
- DB: We should not draw the internal scope too narrowly to begin with
List of requirements:
Requirements should contain (needs more detail):
- scope
- interoperability
- ILS vs other systems
- where are the boundaries?
- Statistics and Reporting should be part of this too
| Requirement | Note | Person |
|---|---|---|