Skip to end of banner
Go to start of banner

Data Import on Aurora Serverless retest

Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 2 Next »

Overview

This page is created to investigate Aurora serverless performance by comparing DB xlarge, 8xlarge and Aurora serverless instance types under load running Data Import (DI) with Check-in Check-out (CICO) running as background. 

Summary


Tests

Job profiles - PTF - Create 2, PTF - Updates Success - 1

Scenario
DI Create 25K, DI Update 25K
DI Create 25K, DI Update 25K with CICO 20 users in parallel
CICO 20 users

Each scenario was tests on next configurations:

DB configuration
RDS

db.r6g.xlarge

db.r6g.8xlarge

Serverless

Serverless v2 (0.5 - 128 ACUs)

Serverless v2 (32 - 128 ACUs)

Results

Process/requestRDSServerless
xlarge8xlarge0.5-128 ACU32-128 ACU
DI Create18 min9 min11 min (-7 min)​14 min (+5 min)​
DI Update17 min10 min16 min (-1 min)​11 min  (+1 min)​
DI Create (with CICO in parallel)22 min9 min20 min (-2 min)​11 min   (+2 min)​
DI Update (with CICO in parallel)22 min, error12 min25 min, error* (+3 min)​12 min (0 min)​
CI, 95%0.680.7180.806 (+0.126 sec)0.794 (+0.076 sec)​
CO, 95%1.2471.2511.393 (+0.146 sec)​1.312 (+0.061 sec)​
CI (with DI Update in parallel), 95%1.361.1931.277 (-0.083 sec)​1.11 (-0.083 sec)​
CO (with DI Update in parallel), 95%2.3352.0622.321 (-0.014 sec)​1.963 (-0.099 sec)​

*Error - io.vertx.core.impl.NoStackTraceThrowable

Instance CPU Utilization


Service CPU Utilization

Memory Utilization

DB CPU Utilization

DB Connections

  • No labels